Teams

Maile/RB/Foothills

2025 Foothills Singles 18 & over · 3.0 Singles Women

6 players · average NTRP 2.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 Singles Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Maile Kim
published
3.13
Becky Brittain
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
3.10
Chloee Dula
published 3
3.07
Emily Spillman
published
2.95
Nina Scopes
published
Charlee Kathleen
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Becky Brittain + Emily Spillman5262% games+5.5% vs expected
Maile Kim + Becky Brittain6254% games−0.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maile Kim
24W–36L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
3
Becky Brittain
137W–96L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.13
3
Chloee Dula
80W–48L career · no lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.10
Emily Spillman
25W–21L career · no lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.07
Nina Scopes
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
2.5
Charlee Kathleen
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.