Teams

Sunpro-Parker/Koehle

2022 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 3.5W AM

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-05-31vs Ace Athletics-Harmon/BastianSplit 22
L#1 DoublesLori Curtis / Jennifer Stringham vs Jaime Vance / Jessica Whittaker1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJamie Faux vs Natalie Stobbe6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKatri Koehle / Debi Green vs Cindy Ostrowski / Rebecca Harman7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRachel Bunker / Jamie Harris vs Lindsey Williams / Bonnie Whitesides5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2022-05-24vs Ivory Ridge-Adams/RoperSplit 11
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Burdge / Lori Curtis vs Jennifer Wells / Cecia Croft6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSherston Faux / Jamie Harris vs Melanie de la Grange / Kelly Midgley4-6, 6-7
2022-05-17vs Sports Mall-Henderson/WalljasperLost 01
L#3 DoublesRachel Bunker / Suzette Greer vs Michelle Edwards / Nicole Reese3-6, 0-6
2022-05-10vs Red Ledges-Clark/ChristensenLost 12
L#1 DoublesKim Santiago / Suzanne Burdge vs Deyce Peterson / Melinda Romney7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKristi Parker / Debi Green vs Lisa Wade / Rachel Ray6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJennifer Stringham / Lori Curtis vs Heather Probst / Heidi Clark4-6, 4-6
2022-05-06vs Liberty Park Tennis-Leishman/EwingSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKristi Parker / Debi Green vs Heather Sliwa / Shelly Kemp4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLori Curtis / Suzanne Burdge vs Lisa Ewing / Allison Leishman6-3, 6-1
2022-05-03Split 11
L#2 DoublesJamie Faux / Sherston Faux vs Sara Johnson / Nicole Garff3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSuzette Greer / Lindsey Ramage vs Aubrey Pluim / Mary Vander Straten6-0, 1-6, 1-0
2022-04-26vs Park City MARC-Leigh/EpsteinSplit 11
W#2 SinglesJamie Faux vs Charlotte Trahan6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLori Curtis / Kristin Rose vs AMy Huish / Jutien Page2-6, 3-6
2022-04-19vs Sunpro-Barber/WestoverWon 20
W#1 SinglesJamie Faux vs Seidi Bennett6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJennifer Stringham / Lori Curtis vs Diane Heaps / Jenni Warner6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2022-04-12vs Cottonwood Club-Kieffer/AnnunziataLost 01
L#3 DoublesSuzette Greer / Rachel Bunker vs Michelle Cutler / Audrey Dufel0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Jamie Faux
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.74
Kim Santiago
usually #1 Singles 36%, also #2 Singles 27% · published 4
3.57
Suzanne Burdge
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.56
Lindsey Ramage
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.34
Jennifer Stringham
usually #3 Doubles 25%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
Debi Green
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Kristi Parker
usually #2 Singles 31%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published
3.10
Katri Koehle
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.10
Lori Curtis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.99
Sherston Faux
usually #1 Singles 46%, also #2 Singles 27% · published 3.5
2.81
Suzette Greer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jamie Harris
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Rachel Bunker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lindsey Ramage + Kim Santiago25859% games+9.6% vs expected
Katri Koehle + Kim Santiago5068% games+8.3% vs expected
Katri Koehle + Lindsey Ramage372056% games+4.4% vs expected
Suzanne Burdge + Lori Curtis251554% games+1.9% vs expected
Jennifer Stringham + Kristi Parker523453% games+1.1% vs expected
Sherston Faux + Jamie Faux0736% games−1.4% vs expected
Suzette Greer + Lindsey Ramage101148% games−1.9% vs expected
Sherston Faux + Lori Curtis7950% games−4.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jamie Faux
9W–9L career · type S · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Kim Santiago
151W–88L career · 10 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
Suzanne Burdge
89W–81L career · 3 lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.57
3.5
Lindsey Ramage
186W–128L career · 14 lines in 2022
<1%31%69%
3.56
3.5
Jennifer Stringham
124W–120L career · 10 lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Debi Green
16W–27L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kristi Parker
97W–110L career · 12 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Katri Koehle
84W–81L career · 9 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.10
Lori Curtis
85W–110L career · 6 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Sherston Faux
88W–157L career · 11 lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
2.99
3
Suzette Greer
75W–73L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Jamie Harris
12W–55L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Rachel Bunker
20W–23L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.