Teams

Liberty Park-Swensen/Sampson

2025 Fall Indoor League-Weekday · 4.0W

15 players · average NTRP 3.81 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-11vs Eagleridge- MowerWon 20
W#1 DoublesMindy Dunyon / Deanne Goaslind vs Nicole Garff / Becky Thompson6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEmily Benton / Gretel Sampson vs Juliette Longson / Sara Johnson6-4, 6-1
L#1 DoublesJessica Gardner / Emily Benton vs Lois Peterson / Lori Briesacher6-3, 4-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMindy Dunyon / Deanne Goaslind vs Janice Smith / Janelle Pulley6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesGretel Sampson / Annette Knight vs Lauren Annunziata / Christine Littleford3-6, 2-6
2025-11-20vs Park City MARC- Greenhalgh/BrooksSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAlena Taylor / Emily Benton vs Sandee Kozel / Carolyn Murnane1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesAlisa Gardner vs Faith Petersen6-3, 4-2
2025-11-18vs Eagleridge- MowerWon 21
L#1 DoublesEmily Benton / Katie Swensen vs Nicole Garff / Jennifer Jensen4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMiranda Edwards vs Cynthia Sterner3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJessica Gardner / Deanne Goaslind vs Amy Rosevear / Lindsey Metcalf7-6, 3-2
2025-11-13vs Eagleridge - GlinesLost 12
W#1 DoublesDeanne Goaslind / Mindy Dunyon vs Michelle Moscon / Carlene Kemp6-4, 3-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAlisa Gardner / Gretel Sampson vs Rosemary Glines / Stacey Cahoon6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJessica Gardner / Julie Hall vs Emily Hales / Debby Richards2-6, 2-6
2025-11-06vs Sports Mall-BrownLost 12
W#1 DoublesJessica Gardner / Miranda Edwards vs Tiffany Zarbock / Erin Bradley3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMindy Dunyon / Deanne Goaslind vs Breanne Taylor / Regina Johnson5-7, 2-3
L#3 DoublesHeather Hayes / Katie Swensen vs McCall Shoff / Yuliya Kozyreva3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · 4.0W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sports Mall-Brown6019514150
2SunPro-Blackhurst/Mayberry5015514132
3Eccles-Love51121227201
4Park City MARC- Greenhalgh/Brooks4215921172
5Eagleridge - Glines4215925184
6Heber Valley-Peterson/King3213718141
7SunPro-Warren/Carter3291126151
8Cottonwood Club-Littleford/Annunziata24131127213
9Ivory Ridge-Christofferson/Murdock24111331217
10Liberty Park-Nelson/Utgaard24101434226
11Eagleridge- Mower2481637225
12Liberty Park-Swensen/Sampson15101433218
13Park City Deb’s Warriors1561838229
14Sunpro-Burdge/Hall0541635203

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Alisa Gardner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.92
Miranda Edwards
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.65
Deanne Goaslind
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.65
Emily Benton
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.65
Mindy Dunyon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.62
Annette Knight
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Jennifer Sampson
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.53
Katie Swensen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.46
Jessica Gardner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.39
Heather Hayes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Gretel Sampson
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.28
Diane Creamer
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
Alena Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Kristen Okland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Julie Hall
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Annette Knight + Emily Benton4264% games+14.7% vs expected
Gretel Sampson + Alisa Gardner11366% games+14.4% vs expected
Jessica Gardner + Alisa Gardner8160% games+10.6% vs expected
Emily Benton + Alisa Gardner11266% games+9.5% vs expected
Jessica Gardner + Gretel Sampson5752% games+8.1% vs expected
Deanne Goaslind + Mindy Dunyon202053% games+5.9% vs expected
Katie Swensen + Heather Hayes4447% games+4.5% vs expected
Alena Taylor + Gretel Sampson151749% games+4.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alisa Gardner
197W–48L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.95
Miranda Edwards
45W–41L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.92
4
Deanne Goaslind
62W–60L career · 5 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
Emily Benton
150W–123L career · 4 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Mindy Dunyon
121W–85L career · 4 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
4
Annette Knight
58W–66L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.62
4
Jennifer Sampson
209W–141L career · 5 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
Katie Swensen
102W–84L career · 2 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.53
Jessica Gardner
83W–72L career · 4 lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.46
Heather Hayes
84W–67L career · 1 line in 2025
78%22%<1%
3.39
3.5
Gretel Sampson
200W–198L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Diane Creamer
116W–110L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Alena Taylor
178W–200L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Kristen Okland
79W–74L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Julie Hall
39W–19L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.