Teams

Haliczer 8.5 Combo 18+

2025 Southern Combo Doubles 18 & Over - HSV · 8.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.25 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-10-05vs Hereford/Kapil 8.5M18Won 21
W#1 DoublesJordan Younghouse / Nathan Johnsen vs Chris Miller / Blake Lancaster6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKody Ehlers / Ross Sargent vs Erek Allen / Gregory Chando6-6
L#3 DoublesJonathan Isaac / Phil Moore vs Jarrett Grubb / Robert Hill3-6, 1-2
2025-08-26vs Hereford/Kapil 8.5M18Lost 02
L#1 DoublesPhil Moore / Ross Sargent vs Jarrett Grubb / Gregory Chando7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesWesley Cole / David Haliczer vs Nevin Langdon / Lafe Wallour6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2025-08-14vs Hereford/Kapil 8.5M18Lost 03
L#1 DoublesWesley Cole / Ben Edwards vs Ian Wisener / Corbin Parker3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Ford / David Haliczer vs Chris Miller / Blake Lancaster6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMatthew Wade / Jonathan Isaac vs Erek Allen / Robert Hill6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Kody Ehlers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.24
Jordan Younghouse
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.11
Kyle Ehlers
published
4.04
Ross Sargent
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.98
Carlos Salas
published 4.5
3.95
Phil Moore
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.78
Nathan Johnsen
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.71
Wesley Cole
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.66
David Haliczer
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Matthew Wade
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nathan Johnsen + Ross Sargent314 matchesnot enough data
Wesley Cole + David Haliczer123 matchesnot enough data
Carlos Salas + Ross Sargent033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kody Ehlers
22W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%16%
4.36
Jordan Younghouse
29W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
4.24
Kyle Ehlers
40W–18L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
4.11
Ross Sargent
100W–31L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
4.04
4.5
Carlos Salas
6W–19L career · no lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
3.98
Phil Moore
10W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
3.95
Nathan Johnsen
47W–19L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Wesley Cole
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
4
David Haliczer
20W–41L career · 6 lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.66
Matthew Wade
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.