Teams

Hereford/Kapil 8.5M18

2025 Southern Combo Doubles 18 & Over - HSV · 8.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.30 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-05vs Haliczer 8.5 Combo 18+Lost 12
L#1 DoublesChris Miller / Blake Lancaster vs Jordan Younghouse / Nathan Johnsen3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesErek Allen / Gregory Chando vs Kody Ehlers / Ross Sargent6-6
W#3 DoublesJarrett Grubb / Robert Hill vs Jonathan Isaac / Phil Moore6-3, 2-1
2025-09-10vs BeckhamWon 20
W#1 DoublesIan Wisener / Corbin Parker vs Michael McLaughlin / Joanah Hudson6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJim Watkins / Robert Hill vs Kyle Miller / Cory Efird6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2025-08-28vs BeckhamLost 12
L#1 DoublesCorbin Parker / Nevin Langdon vs Joanah Hudson / Bryson Beckham3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJared Nixon / Chris Miller vs Michael McLaughlin / William Snyder6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBlake Lancaster / Ian Wisener vs Clayton Simons / Lucas Lampkin3-6, 4-6
2025-08-26vs Haliczer 8.5 Combo 18+Won 30
W#1 DoublesJarrett Grubb / Gregory Chando vs Phil Moore / Ross Sargent6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNevin Langdon / Lafe Wallour vs Wesley Cole / David Haliczer3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChris Miller / Corbin Parker vs Robert Ford / Ben Edwards6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-08-19vs BeckhamLost 02
L#1 DoublesIan Wisener / Blake Lancaster vs Kyle Miller / William Snyder1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJarrett Grubb / Lafe Wallour vs Clayton Simons / Kevin Triplett1-6, 3-6
2025-08-14vs Haliczer 8.5 Combo 18+Won 30
W#1 DoublesIan Wisener / Corbin Parker vs Wesley Cole / Ben Edwards6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesChris Miller / Blake Lancaster vs Robert Ford / David Haliczer4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesErek Allen / Robert Hill vs Matthew Wade / Jonathan Isaac4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-08-09vs BeckhamLost 12
W#1 DoublesIan Wisener / Corbin Parker vs Lucas Lampkin / Clayton Simons6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJosiah Hereford / Jim Watkins vs Kyle Miller / Cory Efird2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesGregory Chando / Lafe Wallour vs Michael McLaughlin / Joanah Hudson3-6, 4-6
2025-08-02vs BeckhamLost 12
L#1 DoublesLafe Wallour / Jarrett Grubb vs Lucas Lampkin / Clayton Simons4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesNevin Langdon / Jim Watkins vs Bryson Beckham / Joanah Hudson7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJosiah Hereford / Gregory Chando vs Lee Thompson / Cory Efird6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 8.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Beckham82191123226
2Hereford/Kapil 8.5M1835131129226
3Haliczer 8.5 Combo 18+2661837250

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.00 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.71
Ian Wisener
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 5
4.32
Erek Allen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.26
Nevin Langdon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.11
Jarrett Grubb
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.04
Josiah Hereford
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.98
Gregory Chando
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.90
Jim Watkins
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.82
Lafe Wallour
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Corbin Parker
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.69
Kapil Pant
published
3.60
Blake Lancaster
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.52
Jared Nixon
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ian Wisener + Corbin Parker303 matchesnot enough data
Jarrett Grubb + Erek Allen213 matchesnot enough data
Jared Nixon + Blake Lancaster303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Ian Wisener
6W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
4.71
4.5
Erek Allen
16W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
4.32
Nevin Langdon
50W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
4.26
Jarrett Grubb
14W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
4.11
Josiah Hereford
19W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
4.04
4
Gregory Chando
67W–16L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.98
Jim Watkins
39W–35L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.90
Lafe Wallour
22W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Corbin Parker
4W–4L career · type M · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kapil Pant
20W–17L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Blake Lancaster
33W–28L career · 10 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.60
Jared Nixon
82W–22L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.