Teams

Armonk Tennis Club: Frank

2023 18&Over Women Day Fall · 3.5 Day

16 players · average NTRP 3.60 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule14 played
2022-12-13vs Greenwich Racquet ClubSplit 11
W#2 DoublesPamela Fuehrer / Susan Heilbrunn vs POULI OTTON / Elizabeth Wells6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesChristina Simon / Crystal Nicolson vs Jane Hentemann / Elizabeth Boutry2-6, 0-6
2022-11-30vs Armonk Indoor: Ace Ace BabyLost 03
L#1 DoublesPamela Fuehrer / Christina Simon vs Lauren Stern / Beth Grotta5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesNadine Shaoul / Crystal Nicolson vs Elissa Lefkowitz / Nadia Weiss2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMaria Vitagliano / Katrina Pape vs Lauren Anchin / Shari Matusow5-7, 4-6
2022-11-22vs Greenwich Racquet ClubLost 01
L#3 DoublesLourdes Marti / Crystal Nicolson vs Elizabeth Wells / Meghan Keane3-6, 2-6
2022-11-08vs HardscrabbleWon 21
W#1 DoublesPamela Fuehrer / Lourdes Marti vs Mina Kim / Kim Bandak6-2, 2-0
L#2 DoublesAyodele Hart / Janice Frank vs Michelle Torre / Elizabeth Becker6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLisa Copeland / Naoko Furube vs Mary Gunzy / Janice Lucchesi6-3, 6-2
W#1 DoublesPamela Fuehrer / Christina Simon vs Karen Rothenberg / Kim Goldner6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCrystal Nicolson / Nadine Shaoul vs Suzanne Sullivan / Kimberly Kraus3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLisa Copeland / Linda Ogden vs Tee Colangelo / Marielise Watts6-7, 0-6
2022-10-19vs Club Fit Briarcliff: Tainted LoveLost 12
W#1 DoublesChristina Simon / Crystal Nicolson vs Lorraine Campo / Karen Graham3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJanice Frank / Nadine Shaoul vs Cindy Greenstein / Marlo Klein3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAyodele Hart / Polly Teitel vs Laurie Leahy / Ellen Cooper0-6, 2-6
2022-10-13vs TIA GRINDERS 4.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesPamela Fuehrer / Christina Simon vs Michele Halem / Sophie Porcelli6-7, 6-1
2022-10-12vs Saw Mill Club Ball BustersWon 21
W#1 DoublesChristina Simon / Pamela Fuehrer vs Kelley Sanders / Sara Hooper6-7, 5-4
W#2 DoublesLourdes Marti / Crystal Nicolson vs Kathleen Gilston / Marlo Brevetti6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesPolly Teitel / Ayodele Hart vs Diana McNelis / Eve Kecskes2-6, 3-6
2022-10-05vs Club Fit Briarcliff FirecrackersWon 30
W#1 DoublesPamela Fuehrer / Christina Simon vs Shuofei Gao / Betsy Ellison6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJanice Frank / Lourdes Marti vs Heidi DeSiena / Lisa Olney6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesConnie Kim / Linda Ogden vs Doreen Engelsher / Toby Amidor6-2, 6-1
2022-10-04vs Armonk Indoor: LobstoppersSplit 11
L#2 DoublesPatti Trainor-Wrazej / Lourdes Marti vs Lori Calat / Andrea Moss4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesPamela Fuehrer / Iris Simens vs Scottie Guerney / Kimberly Kraus6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-09-29vs SMC: We've Got BallsWon 21
W#1 DoublesPamela Fuehrer / Christina Simon vs Karen Malek / Sophie Solomon6-4, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLourdes Marti / Crystal Nicolson vs Natasha Sauerborn / Randa Sauerborn3-6, 5-2
L#3 DoublesNaoko Furube / Lisa Copeland vs KENDLE ARCIDIACONO / Amy Lerner3-6, 1-6
2022-09-28vs Grand Slam: SpinderellasLost 01
L#2 DoublesUsha Subramaniam / Christina Simon vs Erin Harris / Cintia Shiro6-7, 3-6
2022-09-14vs Grand Slam: Slice GirlsWon 21
W#1 DoublesPamela Fuehrer / Crystal Nicolson vs Gina Pacheco / Debra Weiss6-0, 7-5
L#2 DoublesValerie Polera / Lourdes Marti vs Natalia Garcia / Dara Miles4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNadine Shaoul / Naoko Furube vs Rocio Diez / Caroline Paradiso6-1, 7-5
2022-09-13vs Grand Slam: SpinderellasLost 01
L#3 DoublesMelissa Berardis / Crystal Nicolson vs Erin Harris / Cintia Shiro1-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 3.5 Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Grand Slam: Spinderellas01021922217
2Armonk Indoor: Lobstoppers01019922240
3RRC BABS010171024260
4Greenwich Racquet Club010151231262
5Rye Racquet: Networkers010171231263
6TIA GRINDERS 4.0010141232264
7MTDZ: Ace Ace Baby010121634293
8Armonk Tennis Club: Frank010131535272
9Armonk Indoor: Kick Aces010101739284
10TCH Yellowjackets010101843315
11Club Fit Briarcliff01022757349

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Connie Kim
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Crystal Nicolson
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
Pamela Fuehrer
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.70
Lourdes Marti
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
Ayodele Hart
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Christina Simon
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.12
Linda Ogden
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Laura Beber
published 3
Janice Frank
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Katrina Pape
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Lisa Copeland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Maria Vitagliano
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Nadine Shaoul
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Naoko Furube
published
Polly Teitel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Valerie Polera
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Crystal Nicolson + Katrina Pape5163% games+16.2% vs expected
Lourdes Marti + Crystal Nicolson5357% games+15.4% vs expected
Pamela Fuehrer + Lourdes Marti7162% games+15.2% vs expected
Laura Beber + Lourdes Marti8260% games+11.3% vs expected
Naoko Furube + Crystal Nicolson9261% games+8.5% vs expected
Christina Simon + Lourdes Marti5254% games+7.8% vs expected
Christina Simon + Crystal Nicolson10852% games+4.4% vs expected
Maria Vitagliano + Katrina Pape17960% games+3.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Connie Kim
9W–8L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
4
Crystal Nicolson
79W–48L career · 9 lines in 2023
not enough data
Pamela Fuehrer
143W–84L career · 10 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
Lourdes Marti
160W–92L career · 7 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.70
3.5
Ayodele Hart
40W–46L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Christina Simon
83W–65L career · 9 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Linda Ogden
27W–27L career · 2 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.12
3
Laura Beber
165W–132L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.81
Janice Frank
93W–89L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Katrina Pape
56W–18L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Copeland
9W–38L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Maria Vitagliano
21W–11L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nadine Shaoul
77W–93L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Naoko Furube
43W–19L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Polly Teitel
84W–90L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Valerie Polera
63W–61L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.