Teams

High Point/Krekeler W3.5

2022 DTA N · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Friday

13 players · average NTRP 3.40 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Friday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
3.33
Deganit Gal
published 3.5
3.32
Perla Timoney
published
3.30
Hilary Nagel
published 3.5
3.28
Rashi Poddar
published
3.27
Tricia Ehrisman
published
3.20
Heather Alwood
published 3.5
3.13
Celeste Schmidt
published 3.5
3.10
Shari Nederhoff
published
2.86
Christy Key
published 3
2.85
Lisa Krekeler
published
2.62
Nancy Benso
published
Mariko Jahnke
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tricia Ehrisman + Deganit Gal9656% games+7.6% vs expected
Celeste Schmidt + Tricia Ehrisman314 matchesnot enough data
Celeste Schmidt + Deganit Gal123 matchesnot enough data
Shari Nederhoff + MARNI WISE - ITSCOVITCH123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

MARNI WISE - ITSCOVITCH
14W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Deganit Gal
22W–12L career · no lines in 2022
1%89%10%
3.33
Perla Timoney
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Hilary Nagel
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Rashi Poddar
19W–15L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
Tricia Ehrisman
15W–14L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Heather Alwood
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Celeste Schmidt
19W–14L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.13
Shari Nederhoff
6W–12L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.10
3
Christy Key
21W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
2.86
Lisa Krekeler
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
2.85
Nancy Benso
24W–35L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
2.62
Mariko Jahnke
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.