Teams

EMcAllister

2022 Cap Spring USTA 18 & over · 4.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-05-15vs NGoodwinWon 21
L#1 DoublesDara Haney / Amy Wolfe vs Christina Loaiza / Tracy Santrock4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesEva Garland vs Ximena Ordonez-Acevedo3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 SinglesZana Piric vs Amelia Blankenship0-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-05-08vs MThenLost 12
W#1 DoublesErin McAllister / Dara Haney vs Michelle Then / Jordan Fieldstein6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesEva Garland vs Carrie Guthrie0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Wolfe / Zana Piric vs Lindsey Klein / Jessica Sherman1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-05-01vs EJohnsonLost 03
L#1 DoublesDara Haney / Susan Paeplow vs Sandra Chapman-Wilson / Rachael Kiker1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesEva Garland vs Anna Tomkins3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesZana Piric / Kelleigh Russo vs Erika Grenier / Heather Slinkard6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2022-04-24vs GThayer-KempfSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAmy Wolfe / Dara Haney vs Meryl Golder / Stephanie Whiting1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesEva Garland vs Claire Hying3-6, 4-6
2022-04-03vs JGILLENWon 21
L#1 DoublesZana Piric / Alicia Arana vs Jane Britt / Marti Crane4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesEva Garland vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesErin McAllister / Dara Haney vs Lisa Bateman / Marcia Fort4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-03-27vs AKoltchagovaLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlicia Arana / Zana Piric vs Rochelle Grieco / Cynthia Jones7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2022-03-20vs JCoxLost 02
L#1 SinglesEva Garland vs Kathleen Cannon1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesZana Piric / Kelleigh Russo vs Wendy Nelson / Leah Weinberger4-6, 1-6
2022-03-13vs DJohn 18+ 4.0Won 20
W#2 SinglesZana Piric vs Grace Allen4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDara Haney / Lola Jefferies vs QUEEN HARGROVE / Chequetta Ann Nobles Hall6-0, 6-3
2022-03-06vs SRhoades/SARCWon 20
W#1 SinglesEva Garland vs Christine Hughes6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAlicia Arana / Zana Piric vs Jeanmarie Warren / Sandra Rhoades2-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Erin McAllister
published 4
3.62
Susan Paeplow
published
3.48
Dara Haney
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.39
Amy Wolfe
published 3.5
3.34
Sheila Riley
published
3.31
Zana Piric
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Eva Garland
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Janelle Howard
published
3.12
Lola Jefferies
published
3.05
Kelleigh Russo
published
Laura Rendon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dara Haney + Zana Piric224 matchesnot enough data
Sheila Riley + Erin McAllister123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Erin McAllister
26W–22L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.81
Susan Paeplow
4W–9L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.62
3.5
Dara Haney
188W–138L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%55%44%
3.48
3.5
Amy Wolfe
5W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
Sheila Riley
8W–9L career · no lines in 2022
89%11%<1%
3.34
3.5
Zana Piric
135W–175L career · 8 lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Eva Garland
50W–50L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
Janelle Howard
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Lola Jefferies
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
Kelleigh Russo
4W–10L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.05
Laura Rendon
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.