Teams

LVTA NAVY

2023 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER - NOCO

7 players · average NTRP 3.43 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-20vs CSU GREENSplit 11
W#2 DoublesNancy Pflughoeft / Dawn Hagen vs Karen Preiss / Kaylyn Shelby4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCathy Simon / Vicky Hadley vs Julia Tynan / Stephanie Kemp2-6, 2-6
2023-07-13vs CSU GOLDSplit 11
W#1 SinglesDawn Petersen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAmy Black / Nancy Pflughoeft vs Tracy Hutton / Miyuki Chovanetz3-6, 4-6
2023-07-06vs TAG YELLOWWon 21
L#1 DoublesDawn Hagen / Amy Black vs Larea Warden / Lisa Novacek0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesNancy Pflughoeft / Elizabeth Smith vs Janice Mossberg / Annette Nueske6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAustin Johnson / Lesa Morrill-Hughes vs Joyce Hirano-Kuznik / Mary Wedum6-3, 6-4
2023-06-29vs HMTC BLUELost 02
L#2 DoublesCathy Simon / Vicky Hadley vs Kathy Lynch / Maria Ellis6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDawn Petersen / Austin Johnson vs Teresa Adsit / Sara Heskin1-6, 2-6
2023-06-22vs FCCC ORANGELost 03
L#1 DoublesDawn Hagen / Lesa Morrill-Hughes vs Ruth Callahan / June Ellen Feil7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDebbie Hansen / Nancy Pflughoeft vs Kelly Day / Karen Dunbar6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesVicky Hadley / Dawn Petersen vs Jane Schmelzle / Kristie Steinbock2-6, 3-6
2023-06-15vs CSU GREENLost 04
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Smith / Nancy Pflughoeft vs Haley Hasler / Kelli Barber3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesDawn Petersen vs Aileen VanMeveren2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesVicky Hadley / Cathy Simon vs Tahni Clay / Kristen Fahrner2-6, 0-4
L#3 DoublesLesa Morrill-Hughes / Austin Johnson vs Julia Tynan / Pat Murphy-Ebersole2-6, 5-7
2023-06-08vs CSU GOLDLost 01
L#3 DoublesDawn Petersen / Dawn Hagen vs Tracy Hutton / Miyuki Chovanetz6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Debbie Hansen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Vicky Hadley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Dawn Hagen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Lesa Morrill-Hughes
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Austin Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.95
Nancy Pflughoeft
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.87
Dawn Petersen
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debbie Hansen + Nancy Pflughoeft7457% games+4.5% vs expected
Dawn Petersen + Lesa Morrill-Hughes3450% games+4.2% vs expected
Lesa Morrill-Hughes + Dawn Hagen20857% games+4.0% vs expected
Austin Johnson + Lesa Morrill-Hughes4947% games−2.4% vs expected
Austin Johnson + Debbie Hansen4347% games−6.0% vs expected
Dawn Petersen + Nancy Pflughoeft3639% gamesnot enough data
Vicky Hadley + Debbie Hansen044 matchesnot enough data
Dawn Petersen + Dawn Hagen224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Debbie Hansen
51W–45L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Vicky Hadley
29W–45L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Dawn Hagen
43W–35L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Lesa Morrill-Hughes
83W–71L career · 3 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Austin Johnson
41W–60L career · 1 line in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.06
3.5
Nancy Pflughoeft
60W–97L career · 5 lines in 2023
65%35%<1%
2.95
3
Dawn Petersen
70W–102L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
2.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.