Teams

TAG YELLOW

2023 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER - NOCO

12 players · average NTRP 3.45 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-20vs FCCC ORANGELost 13
L#1 DoublesDenise Andrews / Nikki Ellis vs Ruth Callahan / June Ellen Feil0-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesLisa Novacek vs Jane Schmelzle5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnnette Nueske / Michelle Sheets vs Lisa Clay / Jane Gronewoller2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJoyce Hirano-Kuznik / Janice Mossberg vs Kelly Day / Karen Dunbar6-4, 6-3
2023-07-19vs CSU GREENLost 04
L#1 DoublesLisa Novacek / Amber Slade vs Kelli Barber / Kelsey Nosler4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesWendy Saltz vs Aileen VanMeveren2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichelle Sheets / Annette Nueske vs Kaylyn Shelby / Stephanie Kemp2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLarea Warden / Janice Mossberg vs Julia Tynan / Kristen Fahrner2-6, 4-6
2023-07-13vs HMTC BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesAmber Slade / Lisa Novacek vs Sharon Sturges / Teresa Adsit6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesWendy Saltz vs Gina Zachman6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAnnette Nueske / Nikki Ellis vs Maria Ellis / Sara Heskin7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMary Wedum / Denise Andrews vs Wendy Ball / Kathy Lynch6-2, 6-4
2023-07-07vs CSU GOLDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesLisa Novacek / Amber Slade vs Gina Hastings / Laura Powers6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesWendy Saltz vs Alison Halopoff6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAnnette Nueske / Michelle Sheets vs Karen Trevino / Debora J Miller3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJanet Crespin / Larea Warden vs Jill Brooks / Tracy Hutton6-7, 4-6
2023-07-06vs LVTA NAVYLost 13
W#1 DoublesLarea Warden / Lisa Novacek vs Dawn Hagen / Amy Black6-0, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMichelle Sheets vs Nancy Williams0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJanice Mossberg / Annette Nueske vs Nancy Pflughoeft / Elizabeth Smith4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJoyce Hirano-Kuznik / Mary Wedum vs Austin Johnson / Lesa Morrill-Hughes3-6, 4-6
2023-06-23vs FCCC ORANGELost 12
L#1 DoublesLisa Novacek / Janice Mossberg vs Kristine Clagett / Karen Dunbar5-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesNikki Ellis vs Lisa Olsen1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLarea Warden / Janet Crespin vs Lisa Clay / Jennifer Camp6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2023-06-08vs HMTC BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesLisa Novacek / Amber Slade vs Sharon Sturges / Angela Brown6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesWendy Saltz vs Gina Zachman6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMichelle Sheets / Nikki Ellis vs Teresa Adsit / Julie Ignowski0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAnnette Nueske / Joyce Hirano-Kuznik vs Kathy Lynch / Wendy Ball4-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Janet Crespin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.43
Denise Andrews
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
Lisa Novacek
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #1 Singles 14% · published 3.5
3.41
Wendy Saltz
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Larea Warden
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.20
Amber Slade
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Janice Mossberg
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.12
Michelle Sheets
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.10
Nikki Ellis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
2.92
Joyce Hirano-Kuznik
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.88
Annette Nueske
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
Mary Wedum
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Sheets + Janet Crespin7556% games+7.2% vs expected
Lisa Novacek + Amber Slade10454% games+5.8% vs expected
Michelle Sheets + Annette Nueske2646% games+4.1% vs expected
Nikki Ellis + Amber Slade2347% games+3.1% vs expected
Joyce Hirano-Kuznik + Amber Slade8655% games+2.8% vs expected
Joyce Hirano-Kuznik + Janet Crespin6654% games+1.8% vs expected
Lisa Novacek + Janice Mossberg181057% games+1.3% vs expected
Michelle Sheets + Amber Slade12751% games+0.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Janet Crespin
130W–66L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Denise Andrews
35W–32L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Lisa Novacek
105W–55L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Wendy Saltz
64W–33L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Larea Warden
110W–61L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.25
3.5
Amber Slade
46W–43L career · 3 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Janice Mossberg
121W–94L career · 4 lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.13
3.5
Michelle Sheets
67W–96L career · type A · 5 lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Nikki Ellis
30W–58L career · 4 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Joyce Hirano-Kuznik
63W–79L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
72%28%<1%
2.92
3
Annette Nueske
20W–37L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
2.88
Mary Wedum
12W–15L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.