Teams

PC-Doubles or Nothing

2022 Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.60 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-07-30vs WRAC-A-TEARSLost 03
L#1 DoublesSarah Brooks / Cory Brooks vs KIMBERLY HABICH / Brad Bartol4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKristin Ruedel / Jeremey White vs Michael Bendtsen / Kelley Quinn2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesErica Clontz / Evan Mehlenbacher vs Maureen Woodward / Kent Ozkardesh3-6, 3-6
2022-07-29vs PC-BackhandlersWon 30
W#1 DoublesErica Clontz / Jeremey White vs Roman Gavino / Lorena Mayuga6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesSarah Brooks / Cory Brooks vs Moe Davari / Evoria Beasley6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBrando Suarez / Danielle Dunigan vs Craig Hansen / Theresa Koehler7-6, 7-6
2022-07-29Won 30
W#1 DoublesKristin Ruedel / Jeremey White vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesErica Clontz / Evan Mehlenbacher vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDanielle Dunigan / Brando Suarez vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WRAC-A-TEARS3090239
2PC-Happy Hour3193991
3PC-All About That Ace!3184989
4PC-Doubles or Nothing2163655
5PC-Backhandlers12361275
6YTC-Ballers030918108
7SRC-Inland Northwest0411123143

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Cory Brooks
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.44
Brando Suarez
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.39
Erica Clontz
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Sarah Brooks
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.19
Evan Mehlenbacher
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Jeremey White
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.86
Danielle Dunigan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.76
Kristin Ruedel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristin Ruedel + Jeremey White3547% games−18.5% vs expected
Jeremey White + Erica Clontz224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cory Brooks
66W–29L career · 2 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Brando Suarez
27W–44L career · 7 lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
3.44
3.5
Erica Clontz
61W–62L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
Sarah Brooks
52W–31L career · 4 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Evan Mehlenbacher
62W–83L career · 2 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Jeremey White
83W–58L career · 3 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3
Danielle Dunigan
59W–50L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
2.86
Kristin Ruedel
21W–51L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
2.76

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.