Teams

Unforced Terrors

2025 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - POCATELLO · Women 7.0 - 55 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.39 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-09vs Karen McGeeWon 20
W#1 DoublesLurline Berry / Shauna Myler vs Amy Cunningham / Leslie Mulholland6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichele Surmelis / Teresa Henderson vs Venita Petti / Dolly Gonzales6-4, 7-5
2025-05-06vs Karen McGeeWon 21
W#1 DoublesLisa Nelson / Teresa Henderson vs Alyce Brown / Lorie Murray6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNyla Kress / Shauna Myler vs Karen Grasso / Leslie Mulholland6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesPatricia Bolinger / Panayota Semons-Short vs Venita Petti / Dolly Gonzales6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-05-03vs Karen McGeeWon 30
W#1 DoublesLurline Berry / Panayota Semons-Short vs Cindy Hansen / Karen Grasso6-4, 4-3
W#2 DoublesMichele Surmelis / Nyla Kress vs Lorie Murray / Robbie Spicer6-3, 5-3
W#3 DoublesJacqualyn Nelson / Lisa Nelson vs Dolly Gonzales / Venita Petti6-0, 6-1
2025-05-01vs Karen McGeeLost 12
L#1 DoublesLurline Berry / Shauna Myler vs Amy Cunningham / Cara Sonnemann4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTeresa Henderson / Patricia Bolinger vs Theresa Mansfield / Alyce Brown4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNyla Kress / Panayota Semons-Short vs Anne MacLachlan / Karen McGee6-1, 6-2
2025-04-27vs Karen McGeeWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichele Surmelis / Nyla Kress vs Anne MacLachlan / Cara Sonnemann6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLurline Berry / Panayota Semons-Short vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTeresa Henderson / Jacqualyn Nelson vs Karen Grasso / Amy Cunningham6-2, 6-0
2025-04-22vs Karen McGeeWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichele Surmelis / Nyla Kress vs Amy Cunningham / Cara Sonnemann6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLisa Nelson / Patricia Bolinger vs Cindy Hansen / Theresa Mansfield6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTeresa Henderson / Carrie Rose Lindley vs Anne MacLachlan / Karen McGee7-6, 6-3
2025-04-19vs Karen McGeeWon 21
W#1 DoublesNyla Kress / Michele Surmelis vs Anne MacLachlan / Alyce Brown6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Nelson / Jacqualyn Nelson vs Amy Cunningham / Cara Sonnemann6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLurline Berry / Shauna Myler vs Karen Grasso / Lorie Murray6-2, 6-0
2025-04-16vs Karen McGeeWon 30
W#1 DoublesNyla Kress / Michele Surmelis vs Amy Cunningham / Theresa Mansfield5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Nelson / Patricia Bolinger vs Robbie Spicer / Cindy Hansen6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLurline Berry / Carrie Rose Lindley vs Leslie Mulholland / Alyce Brown6-4, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 7.0 - 55 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Unforced Terrors7119514163
2Karen McGee1751942264

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Nyla Kress
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.66
Lurline Berry
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.46
Jacqualyn Nelson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.39
Teresa Henderson
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.17
Patricia Bolinger
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.13
Lisa Nelson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.06
Michele Surmelis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.02
Carrie Rose Lindley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Shauna Myler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.78
Panayota Semons-Short
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
TIna Fehringer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lurline Berry + Michele Surmelis8066% games+8.2% vs expected
Teresa Henderson + Jacqualyn Nelson8267% games+5.5% vs expected
Nyla Kress + Michele Surmelis19265% games+4.5% vs expected
Patricia Bolinger + Lisa Nelson4254% games+2.0% vs expected
Lurline Berry + Jacqualyn Nelson7749% games+0.4% vs expected
Lisa Nelson + Teresa Henderson181655% games−0.7% vs expected
Michele Surmelis + Panayota Semons-Short171449% games−2.0% vs expected
Michele Surmelis + Carrie Rose Lindley3839% games−5.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Nyla Kress
103W–54L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.89
4
Lurline Berry
88W–101L career · 6 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
3.5
Jacqualyn Nelson
214W–199L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Teresa Henderson
127W–103L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Patricia Bolinger
16W–54L career · 4 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Lisa Nelson
73W–131L career · 5 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
3
Michele Surmelis
238W–161L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.06
3
Carrie Rose Lindley
49W–62L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Shauna Myler
104W–147L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
2.85
3
Panayota Semons-Short
104W–117L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
TIna Fehringer
34W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.