Teams

RCC GREEN

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-05vs BCC REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesTy Gee / Diego Rosso vs Pete Nichols / William Kramer3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBrian Cavanaugh / Bryan Cobb vs Justin Astley / Brian Waters3-6, 6-7
2026-07-29vs CVTA TEALWon 21
W#1 DoublesTravis LaBerge / Diego Rosso vs Riley Conroy / Stephen Cook7-5, 6-4
L#1 SinglesPhilip Wang vs Alexander Muhr0-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesBryan Cobb / Ty Gee vs Tim Graves / Andrew Jones7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2026-07-22vs TTA GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesTravis LaBerge / Brian Cavanaugh vs Ron Phillips / Kevin Davis6-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesBrian Parr vs Geoffrey Sherman6-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesBryan Cobb / Seth Chernoff vs Benjamin Liu / Mark Flanigan6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Ty Gee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.93
Jonathan Hoke
published
3.82
Brian Parr
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.79
Diego Rosso
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Philip Wang
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.79
Travis LaBerge
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Bryan Cobb
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Brian Cavanaugh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.70
Seth Chernoff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ty Gee + Jonathan Hoke404 matchesnot enough data
Bryan Cobb + Ty Gee213 matchesnot enough data
Bryan Cobb + Seth Chernoff303 matchesnot enough data
Ty Gee + Travis LaBerge303 matchesnot enough data
Ty Gee + Diego Rosso123 matchesnot enough data
Travis LaBerge + Brian Cavanaugh213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ty Gee
65W–36L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.98
Jonathan Hoke
9W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.93
4
Brian Parr
17W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Diego Rosso
10W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
Philip Wang
12W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Travis LaBerge
115W–55L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Bryan Cobb
16W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.75
4
Brian Cavanaugh
16W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Seth Chernoff
31W–30L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
3.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.