Teams

CVTA TEAL

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-19vs TTA GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesAlexander Muhr / Luke Trautwein vs Kevin Davis / Rob Pickup6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJoseph Jaros vs Caleb Fahrner6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTim Graves / Stephen Cook vs Travis Crouch / Benjamin Liu6-7, 7-6, 0-1
2026-08-12vs NJ GREENWon 21
L#1 DoublesTim Graves / Riley Conroy vs Ron Funderburke / Russell Ridings4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJoseph Jaros vs Garrett Witt6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLuke Trautwein / Stephen Cook vs William Wendt / Joshua Larson7-5, 7-5
2026-08-05vs CVTA GREENWon 21
L#1 DoublesRiley Conroy / Andrew Jones vs Devon Glosser / Thai La3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesTim Graves vs Joshua Dirksen6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesAlexander Muhr / West Obenauer vs Alan Tawa / Robert Tawa6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2026-07-29vs RCC GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesRiley Conroy / Stephen Cook vs Travis LaBerge / Diego Rosso5-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesAlexander Muhr vs Philip Wang6-0, 7-6
L#2 DoublesTim Graves / Andrew Jones vs Bryan Cobb / Ty Gee7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2026-07-22vs BCC REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlexander Muhr / Luke Trautwein vs Will Day / Pete Nichols6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJoseph Jaros vs Eric Loof7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTim Graves / Riley Conroy vs Jay Sonnenberg / Randy Gilbride6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.10
Joseph Jaros
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.88
Alexander Muhr
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.72
Riley Conroy
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.71
Luke Trautwein
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.65
Tim Graves
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.57
Andrew Jones
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.56
West Obenauer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.42
Stephen Cook
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Luke Trautwein + Alexander Muhr123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joseph Jaros
25W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
4.10
4
Alexander Muhr
34W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
Riley Conroy
38W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Luke Trautwein
11W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
Tim Graves
21W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
3.65
4
Andrew Jones
1W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.57
4
West Obenauer
29W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.56
Stephen Cook
8W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
71%29%<1%
3.42

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.