Teams

CVTA GREEN

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT

7 players · average NTRP 3.93 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-19vs BCC REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesThai La / Devon Glosser vs Justin Astley / Brian Waters6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJoshua Dirksen vs William Kramer2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSteve Harford / Robert Tawa vs David Simenc / Randy Gilbride6-1, 6-2
2026-08-05vs CVTA TEALLost 12
W#1 DoublesDevon Glosser / Thai La vs Riley Conroy / Andrew Jones6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJoshua Dirksen vs Tim Graves2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesAlan Tawa / Robert Tawa vs Alexander Muhr / West Obenauer1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-07-29vs TTA GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesThai La / Joshua Dirksen vs Rob Pickup / Kevin Davis4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesDevon Glosser vs Ron Phillips6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSteve Harford / Robert Tawa vs Caleb Fahrner / Mark Flanigan6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2026-07-28vs NJ GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesGaius Roemer / Alan Tawa vs Garrett Sailer / Mark Bauerle3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJoshua Dirksen vs Garrett Witt3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRobert Tawa / Devon Glosser vs Jeremy Hand / Joshua Larson6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Steve Harford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Alan Tawa
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Devon Glosser
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.65
Gaius Roemer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Thai La
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Joshua Dirksen
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.40
Robert Tawa
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steve Harford + Joshua Dirksen2550% games+9.8% vs expected
Steve Harford + Robert Tawa3349% games+6.4% vs expected
Steve Harford + Thai La71047% games+1.3% vs expected
Robert Tawa + Gaius Roemer1635% games−8.7% vs expected
Thai La + Joshua Dirksen1442% gamesnot enough data
Thai La + Robert Tawa134 matchesnot enough data
Thai La + Devon Glosser134 matchesnot enough data
Robert Tawa + Joshua Dirksen224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Steve Harford
28W–46L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.74
4
Alan Tawa
0W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Devon Glosser
27W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Gaius Roemer
8W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Thai La
16W–42L career · 3 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Joshua Dirksen
33W–71L career · 4 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Robert Tawa
24W–64L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.