Teams

NJ GREEN

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-12vs CVTA TEALLost 12
W#1 DoublesRon Funderburke / Russell Ridings vs Tim Graves / Riley Conroy6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesGarrett Witt vs Joseph Jaros3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesWilliam Wendt / Joshua Larson vs Luke Trautwein / Stephen Cook5-7, 5-7
2026-08-05vs TTA GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesGarrett Sailer / Taylor Devlin vs Rob Pickup / Caleb Fahrner7-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesGarrett Witt vs Geoffrey Sherman7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJoshua Larson / William Wendt vs Ron Phillips / Kevin Davis2-6, 2-6
2026-07-29vs BCC REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesGarrett Sailer / Taylor Devlin vs Justin Astley / Pete Nichols6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMark Bauerle vs Joseph Hake7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJeremy Hand / William Wendt vs Jay Sonnenberg / Brian Waters3-6, 4-6
2026-07-28vs CVTA GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesGarrett Sailer / Mark Bauerle vs Gaius Roemer / Alan Tawa3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesGarrett Witt vs Joshua Dirksen6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJeremy Hand / Joshua Larson vs Robert Tawa / Devon Glosser2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Mark Bauerle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.86
Garrett Sailer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Rafael Rosario
published
3.73
Ron Funderburke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
William Wendt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Jeremy Hand
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Garrett Witt
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.56
Russell Ridings
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.36
Joshua Larson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Taylor Devlin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Garrett Sailer + Mark Bauerle5162% games+10.6% vs expected
William Wendt + Joshua Larson2443% games−0.8% vs expected
Garrett Sailer + Jeremy Hand224 matchesnot enough data
Garrett Sailer + Ron Funderburke134 matchesnot enough data
Garrett Sailer + Rafael Rosario213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Mark Bauerle
89W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
4.02
4
Garrett Sailer
66W–52L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.86
Rafael Rosario
20W–14L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Ron Funderburke
78W–81L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
William Wendt
15W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
Jeremy Hand
8W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
Garrett Witt
12W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Russell Ridings
76W–75L career · 1 line in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.56
Joshua Larson
4W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
84%16%<1%
3.36
Taylor Devlin
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.