Teams

RHCC RED

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-05-26vs HIW GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesCharlotte Smith / Shannon Byerly vs Sharlene Funk / Jayne McGarry6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJennifer Kos / Brandee Caswell vs Roisin Lakings / Brenda Park6-2, 6-2
2021-05-19vs NJ PURPLELost 01
L#1 DoublesShannon Byerly / Brandee Caswell vs Pamela Johnstone / Lisa Kellogg4-6, 1-6
2021-05-12vs NJ GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesShannon Byerly / Jessica Tsuo vs Sheila O'Neill - (DQ) / Susan Tomlinson2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBrandee Caswell / Polly Traylor vs Laura Kelly / Margaret Parris2-6, 4-6
2021-05-05vs LPTC SILVERWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Kos / Brandee Caswell vs Rebecca BaanHofman / Tina Atchley7-6, 6-3
2021-04-28vs BP REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesShannon Byerly / Jessica Tsuo vs Angela Martin / Alexis Haws4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2021-04-22vs HIW GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesShannon Byerly / Polly Traylor vs Jayne McGarry / Roisin Lakings6-1, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Jessica Tsuo
published
2.75
Charlotte Smith
published 3
Gretchen Moser
published 3
2.66
Jennifer Kos
published
2.57
Brandee Caswell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.44
Shannon Byerly
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Danielle Dascalos
published
Lindsey Fleener
published
Polly Traylor
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Kos + Lindsey Fleener6063% games+11.1% vs expected
Shannon Byerly + Gretchen Moser3550% games+6.5% vs expected
Shannon Byerly + Brandee Caswell8455% games+5.9% vs expected
Charlotte Smith + Gretchen Moser8263% games+5.4% vs expected
Jennifer Kos + Gretchen Moser8655% games+2.4% vs expected
Charlotte Smith + Jennifer Kos3452% games+1.9% vs expected
Lindsey Fleener + Shannon Byerly2550% games+0.7% vs expected
Jennifer Kos + Shannon Byerly4353% games−0.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessica Tsuo
78W–35L career · no lines in 2021
41%59%<1%
3.53
3
Charlotte Smith
29W–25L career · type A · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
2.75
3
Gretchen Moser
40W–39L career · type A · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Jennifer Kos
65W–46L career · no lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
2.66
3
Brandee Caswell
47W–33L career · type A · 4 lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
2.57
3
Shannon Byerly
35W–38L career · 5 lines in 2021
66%34%<1%
2.44
Danielle Dascalos
4W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Lindsey Fleener
29W–12L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Polly Traylor
17W–13L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.