Teams

NJ PURPLE

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.30 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-06-02vs LPTC SILVERWon 10
W#2 DoublesAmy Kempster / Lisa Kellogg vs Neha Arora / Kay Newman6-4, 6-3
2021-05-26vs BP REDWon 10
W#1 SinglesDenise Champion vs Amy Daly7-5, 7-5
2021-05-19vs RHCC REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPamela Johnstone / Lisa Kellogg vs Shannon Byerly / Brandee Caswell6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAmy Kempster / Christine Loehr vs Jennifer Kos / Danielle Dascalos2-6, 3-6
2021-05-12vs HIW GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesDenise Champion / Christine Loehr vs Sharlene Funk / Roisin Lakings6-4, 6-2
2021-05-05Won 10
W#1 SinglesLisa Kellogg vs Laura Kelly6-3, 6-0
2021-04-28vs LPTC SILVERWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Kellogg / Denise Champion vs Annie Bennett / Casey Tatum7-6, 7-5
2021-04-25vs BP REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesChristine Loehr / Denise Champion vs Amy Daly / Angela Martin6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Pamela Johnstone
published 3.5
3.34
Kerry Mobley
published
3.22
Lisa Kellogg
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.21
Denise Champion
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.85
Nicole Cotta
published 3
2.75
Christine Loehr
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Amy Kempster
published
Sharon Gordon
published
Tracey Perry
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamela Johnstone + Christine Loehr9166% games+14.6% vs expected
Pamela Johnstone + Lisa Kellogg14265% games+14.1% vs expected
Christine Loehr + Kerry Mobley6260% games+10.1% vs expected
Pamela Johnstone + Kerry Mobley34860% games+8.0% vs expected
Christine Loehr + Lisa Kellogg8452% games+5.3% vs expected
Denise Champion + Christine Loehr314 matchesnot enough data
Kerry Mobley + Lisa Kellogg314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Pamela Johnstone
194W–65L career · no lines in 2021
<1%61%39%
3.46
Kerry Mobley
96W–38L career · no lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
3.34
3.5
Lisa Kellogg
118W–44L career · 4 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.22
3.5
Denise Champion
165W–64L career · 4 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.21
3
Nicole Cotta
97W–66L career · no lines in 2021
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Christine Loehr
122W–112L career · 3 lines in 2021
3%95%2%
2.75
Amy Kempster
3W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sharon Gordon
3W–22L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Tracey Perry
19W–29L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.