Teams

SLDFI-Fiore/Westport

Lake USTA 40 & Over Summer Singles · 3.0 Women 40+ Singles

8 players · average NTRP 2.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 SinglesJoAnna Kauffman vs Denisha Atkins6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJennifer Cesmat vs Tiffany Brown-bush6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJoAnna Kauffman vs Delia Graham1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesLaura Gagel vs Jennifer Haigler6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesDIANE FIORE vs Jennifer Haigler4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 SinglesLaura Gagel vs Victoria Morris5-7, 2-6
L#3 SinglesJennifer Cesmat vs Denisha Atkins5-7, 5-7
L#1 SinglesLaura Gagel vs Delia Graham6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesDIANE FIORE vs Victoria Morris3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJennifer Cesmat vs Jennifer Haigler6-7, 5-7
L#2 SinglesKatie Blixt vs Tiffany Brown-bush6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesLaura Gagel vs Victoria Morris6-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesKatie Blixt vs Jennifer Haigler6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJennifer Cesmat vs Delia Graham2-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesLaura Gagel vs Denisha Atkins6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 Women 40+ Singles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SLDAT-Atkins/Jetton 40+ 3.0 Friday AM4312921188
2SLDFI-Fiore/Westport2561531209

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Sandra Self
published
2.69
Carla Deck
published 3
2.67
JoAnna Kauffman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.64
DIANE FIORE
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.56
Katie Blixt
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.54
Jennifer Cesmat
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
2.51
Laura Gagel
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Singles 40% · published
2.37
Ashley Witherspoon
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

JoAnna Kauffman + Carla Deck11755% games+8.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sandra Self
12W–20L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Carla Deck
78W–58L career · no lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.69
3
JoAnna Kauffman
97W–87L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.67
3
DIANE FIORE
67W–62L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
2.64
3
Katie Blixt
14W–55L career · 2 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
2.56
Jennifer Cesmat
2W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
2.54
Laura Gagel
17W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%46%54%
2.51
2.5
Ashley Witherspoon
2W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%84%16%
2.37

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.