Teams

SLDAT-Atkins/Jetton 40+ 3.0 Friday AM

Lake USTA 40 & Over Summer Singles · 3.0 Women 40+ Singles

5 players · average NTRP 2.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-31vs SLDFI-Fiore/WestportLost 02
L#1 SinglesDenisha Atkins vs JoAnna Kauffman4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesTiffany Brown-bush vs Jennifer Cesmat2-6, 2-6
2026-07-17vs SLDFI-Fiore/WestportWon 21
W#1 SinglesDelia Graham vs JoAnna Kauffman6-1, 6-3
L#2 SinglesJennifer Haigler vs Laura Gagel2-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesDenisha Atkins vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-07-10vs SLDFI-Fiore/WestportWon 30
W#1 SinglesJennifer Haigler vs DIANE FIORE6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesVictoria Morris vs Laura Gagel7-5, 6-2
W#3 SinglesDenisha Atkins vs Jennifer Cesmat7-5, 7-5
2026-07-07vs SLDFI-Fiore/WestportWon 20
W#1 SinglesDelia Graham vs Laura Gagel4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesVictoria Morris vs DIANE FIORE6-3, 6-2
2026-06-26vs SLDFI-Fiore/WestportWon 30
W#1 SinglesJennifer Haigler vs Jennifer Cesmat7-6, 7-5
W#2 SinglesTiffany Brown-bush vs Katie Blixt6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesVictoria Morris vs Laura Gagel7-6, 6-4
2026-06-05vs SLDFI-Fiore/WestportLost 12
L#1 SinglesJennifer Haigler vs Katie Blixt4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesDelia Graham vs Jennifer Cesmat6-2, 6-4
L#3 SinglesDenisha Atkins vs Laura Gagel1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 Women 40+ Singles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SLDAT-Atkins/Jetton 40+ 3.0 Friday AM4312921188
2SLDFI-Fiore/Westport2561531209

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.55 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Delia Graham
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.52
Jennifer Haigler
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.52
Victoria Morris
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.49
Tiffany Brown-bush
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.27
Denisha Atkins
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Delia Graham
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.92
3
Jennifer Haigler
22W–27L career · 4 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
2.52
Victoria Morris
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
2.52
Tiffany Brown-bush
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
2.49
2.5
Denisha Atkins
13W–40L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.