Teams

IE-APTC-Ruby V.

2021 USTA Adult 18 & Over - IE · IE Women 3.5

5 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-06-06vs IE-CL-Rhianna/ValLost 01
L#1 DoublesJannah Carrasco / Jane Magro vs Tammy Kennedy / Keiko Dodge3-6, 2-6
2021-05-29vs IE-MMHS-Joanne HarnedSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSaleshnie Sukhram / Nanette Pratini vs Jeanie Thacker / Nath Sayasane6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesEthel Manley / Jane Magro vs Leslie Martin / April Mays6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2021-05-23vs IE-CCCC-Kathy CockerWon 10
W#2 DoublesJannah Carrasco / Saleshnie Sukhram vs Ilse Ungeheuer / Nadine Arnaiz-Bradvica6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2021-05-15vs IE-M6-Ellen YarterLost 02
L#1 DoublesJane Magro / Nanette Pratini vs Ellen Yarter / Laurel Eriksen7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEthel Manley / Connie DeLong vs Devan Olfman / Kerri Munson4-6, 2-6
2021-05-02vs IE-CCCC-Sesilie/DanaWon 20
W#1 DoublesMarisa Gauss / Jannah Carrasco vs Heidi Brun / Kathy Reeves7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNanette Pratini / Jane Magro vs Noelle Park / Denise Stewart6-4, 6-2
2021-04-18vs IE-LLW-Jeanne ShelterLost 01
L#1 DoublesConnie DeLong / Nanette Pratini vs Joan Greene / Rebecca Cloyd2-6, 5-7
2021-04-11Lost 01
L#2 DoublesConnie DeLong / Jane Magro vs Maria Garcia / Sheila Walkington1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Saleshnie Sukhram
published 3.5
3.41
Jane Magro
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.35
Jannah Carrasco
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Connie DeLong
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Nanette Pratini
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane Magro + Jannah Carrasco5650% gamesnot enough data
Connie DeLong + Jannah Carrasco2452% gamesnot enough data
Saleshnie Sukhram + Jannah Carrasco4154% gamesnot enough data
Connie DeLong + Nanette Pratini213 matchesnot enough data
Jane Magro + Saleshnie Sukhram123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Saleshnie Sukhram
114W–80L career · no lines in 2021
<1%45%55%
3.52
3.5
Jane Magro
73W–54L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Jannah Carrasco
84W–81L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Connie DeLong
49W–49L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Nanette Pratini
28W–44L career · 4 lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
3.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.