Teams

IE-CCCC-Kathy Cocker

2021 USTA Adult 18 & Over - IE · IE Women 3.5

5 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-05-23vs IE-APTC-Ruby V.Split 11
W#1 DoublesSusan Lacina / Kathalena Cocker vs Erin Conner / Monica Joersz6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesIlse Ungeheuer / Nadine Arnaiz-Bradvica vs Jannah Carrasco / Saleshnie Sukhram2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2021-05-16vs IE-LLW-Jeanne ShelterWon 10
W#2 DoublesIlse Ungeheuer / Carmen Underwood vs Rebecca Cloyd / Tara Jones6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2021-05-01vs IE-MMHS-Joanne HarnedWon 10
W#1 DoublesRenee Zack / Kathalena Cocker vs Jeanie Thacker / April Mays6-0, 6-1
2021-04-25vs IE-CCCC-Sesilie/DanaWon 10
W#1 DoublesKathalena Cocker / Susan Lacina vs Kelly Barhorst / Sesilie Kay6-1, 6-1
2021-04-17Lost 01
L#1 SinglesIlse Ungeheuer vs Sheila Walkington0-6, 3-6
2021-04-11vs IE-CL-Rhianna/ValSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKathalena Cocker / Nadine Arnaiz-Bradvica vs Melissa Connor / Michelle Porter7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCarmen Underwood / Ilse Ungeheuer vs Monica Hempel / Rhonda Arendt6-4, 6-0
2021-04-03vs IE-M6-Ellen YarterLost 02
L#1 SinglesIlse Ungeheuer vs Shannon Sapp1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKathalena Cocker / Julie Perkins vs Kerri Munson / Jill Mastroluca4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Julie Perkins
published
3.42
Ilse Ungeheuer
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.31
Kathalena Cocker
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Renee Zack
published
Shelley Mellentine
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Perkins
9W–10L career · no lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.78
3.5
Ilse Ungeheuer
89W–80L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Kathalena Cocker
136W–140L career · 8 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.31
Renee Zack
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Shelley Mellentine
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.