Teams

IA-REG-Avilez

40 & Over Mixed- Sept. 22-24 · 7.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NEBRASKA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings8 teams · 7.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HOA-REG-Craig/40&Over7.0MXD000000
2IA-REG-Avilez000000
3KS-REG-Seitz/Ritter/40&OverMixed7.0000000
4NE-REG-Erwin/Tong000000
5OK-Reg-Doughty-Wood000000
6STL-REG-Risley-Winn/40&Over7.0MXD000000
7MO-REG-Kim/40&OverMixed7.0000000
8WC-REG-Strawhecker000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Anne Pham
published 4
3.73
Matthew Whipps
published
3.65
Nathan Johnston
published
3.48
Todd Versteeg
published
3.44
Lauma Dimpere
published
3.33
Ruben Avilez
published
3.31
Nick Stahly
published
3.28
Candy Vandewater
published 3.5
3.19
Jennifer Hough
published
2.80
Stephanie Anania
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nick Stahly + Stephanie Anania3351% games+5.1% vs expected
Jennifer Hough + Todd Versteeg4151% gamesnot enough data
Matthew Whipps + Stephanie Anania314 matchesnot enough data
Nathan Johnston + Jennifer Hough213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anne Pham
99W–29L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
Matthew Whipps
63W–57L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
Nathan Johnston
57W–35L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.65
Todd Versteeg
40W–50L career · no lines in 2023
<1%55%44%
3.48
Lauma Dimpere
38W–24L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.44
Ruben Avilez
33W–23L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.33
Nick Stahly
47W–43L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Candy Vandewater
29W–25L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.28
Jennifer Hough
30W–14L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
Stephanie Anania
38W–35L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.80

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.