Teams

WP RED

2024 CTA ADULT 18-39 - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN

8 players · average NTRP 3.70 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-07-18vs CP WHITEWon 10
W#1 Female SinglesMichela Zafferani vs Anasa Shank6-3, 6-4
2024-07-04Won 20
W#1 Female SinglesMegan Gunden vs Molly Smith6-3, 6-0
W#2 Female SinglesMichela Zafferani vs Grace Michaels6-1, 6-0
2024-06-13Won 10
W#1 Female SinglesMichela Zafferani vs Fiona Reynolds6-1, 6-1
2024-06-06vs SKY NAVYLost 02
L#1 Female SinglesMichela Zafferani vs Lauren Flynn6-0, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 Female SinglesMegan Gunden vs Sarah Bailey3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · WOMEN 3.5 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CP WHITE511449119
2WP RED4211716140
3BP GREEN339919161
4SKY NAVY339921172
5MVCC RED2451330201
6WP NAVY1551326185

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Casey Thomas
published 4
3.54
Michela Zafferani
usually #1 Female Singles 75%, also #2 Female Singles 25% · published 4
3.52
Rachel Williams
published
3.47
Laura Wasserman
published
3.43
Megan Gunden
usually #2 Female Singles 50%, also #1 Female Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.38
Audrey Hamilton
published 3.5
3.23
Shereen Sairafi
published
3.06
Aubrey Siegel
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Wasserman + Rachel Williams301160% games+6.0% vs expected
Rachel Williams + Megan Gunden5066% games+2.4% vs expected
Audrey Hamilton + Michela Zafferani4456% games+0.4% vs expected
Audrey Hamilton + Rachel Williams314 matchesnot enough data
Michela Zafferani + Megan Gunden404 matchesnot enough data
Casey Thomas + Audrey Hamilton303 matchesnot enough data
Casey Thomas + Rachel Williams303 matchesnot enough data
Audrey Hamilton + Laura Wasserman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Casey Thomas
74W–33L career · no lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Michela Zafferani
102W–61L career · 4 lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.54
Rachel Williams
89W–23L career · no lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
3.52
Laura Wasserman
70W–48L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Megan Gunden
106W–51L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Audrey Hamilton
86W–47L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.38
Shereen Sairafi
25W–11L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Aubrey Siegel
10W–12L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.