Teams

BP GREEN

2024 CTA ADULT 18-39 - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN

7 players · average NTRP 3.40 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-07-11vs MVCC REDWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesKarleigh Kimble / Cayti Stein vs Lindsay Gordon / Emily Brennan7-5, 6-4
W#2 Female SinglesMargarite Parker vs Danielle Rooney6-4, 6-2
2024-07-05Won 10
W#1 Female DoublesMargarite Parker / Cayti Stein vs Hilary Murphy / Lauren Anderson6-2, 7-5
2024-06-27vs TTA BLUEWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesCayti Stein / Karleigh Kimble vs Kelsa Morgan / Tara Tovar6-0, 6-4
W#2 Female SinglesMargarite Parker vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-06-13vs NJ REDLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesCarly Michel / Margarite Parker vs Everett Johnson / Mary Virginia Simpson4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-06-06vs TTA BLUELost 01
L#2 Female SinglesCayti Stein vs Kelsa Morgan1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · WOMEN 3.5 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CP WHITE511449119
2WP RED4211716140
3BP GREEN339919161
4SKY NAVY339921172
5MVCC RED2451330201
6WP NAVY1551326185

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Margarite Parker
usually #1 Female Doubles 50%, also #2 Female Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Amy Dre
published 3.5
3.17
Celine Fucci
published 3.5
3.11
Cayti Stein
usually #1 Female Doubles 75%, also #2 Female Singles 25% · published 3.5
Carly Michel
published 3
Karleigh Kimble
published
Katherine Moriarty
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karleigh Kimble + Cayti Stein5450% games+2.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Margarite Parker
52W–37L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Amy Dre
14W–4L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Celine Fucci
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Cayti Stein
29W–28L career · 4 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.11
3
Carly Michel
0W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Karleigh Kimble
22W–20L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Katherine Moriarty
11W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.