Teams

TTA BLUE

2024 CTA ADULT 18-39 - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-22vs MVCC REDSplit 11
L#1 Female DoublesSara Mize / Kelsa Morgan vs Hilary Murphy / Lauren Anderson1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 Female SinglesKaylee Henley vs Danielle Rooney6-3, 6-3
2024-07-11vs NJ REDLost 02
L#1 Female DoublesSarah Vincent / Kelsa Morgan vs Holland Asbach / Mary Virginia Simpson3-6, 4-6
L#2 Female SinglesSara Mize vs Kristen Clauss0-6, 1-6
2024-06-27vs BP GREENSplit 11
L#1 Female DoublesKelsa Morgan / Tara Tovar vs Cayti Stein / Karleigh Kimble0-6, 4-6
W#1 Female SinglesKaylee Henley vs Celine Fucci6-2, 6-1
2024-06-20vs NJ REDSplit 11
L#1 Female DoublesKelsa Morgan / Tara Tovar vs Mary Virginia Simpson / Holland Asbach2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 Female SinglesKaylee Henley vs Molly Myers6-1, 6-1
2024-06-13vs MVCC REDLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesSarah Vincent / Sara Mize vs Lindsay Gordon / Lauren Anderson4-6, 5-7
2024-06-06vs BP GREENWon 30
W#1 Female DoublesTara Tovar / Sarah Vincent vs Carly Michel / Celine Fucci6-0, 6-3
W#1 Female SinglesKaylee Henley vs Karleigh Kimble6-4, 6-3
W#2 Female SinglesKelsa Morgan vs Cayti Stein6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Kaylee Henley
usually #1 Female Singles 75%, also #2 Female Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.34
Sara Mize
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #2 Female Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Sarah Vincent
published
3.01
Tara Tovar
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.90
2.88
Kelsa Morgan
usually #1 Female Doubles 80%, also #2 Female Singles 20% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tara Tovar + Kelsa Morgan41046% games−3.7% vs expected
Kelsa Morgan + Kaylee Henley213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kaylee Henley
105W–44L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Sara Mize
25W–21L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%88%11%
3.34
Sarah Vincent
41W–26L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Tara Tovar
30W–36L career · 3 lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.01
Kirstin Santa Scholberg
10W–16L career · no lines in 2024
77%23%<1%
2.90
3.5
Kelsa Morgan
39W–60L career · 5 lines in 2024
83%17%<1%
2.88

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.