Teams

NJ RED

2024 CTA ADULT 18-39 - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN

7 players · average NTRP 3.62 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-07-11vs TTA BLUEWon 30
W#1 Female DoublesHolland Asbach / Mary Virginia Simpson vs Sarah Vincent / Kelsa Morgan6-3, 6-4
W#1 Female SinglesAlyssa Cormack vs Jordan Smith7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 Female SinglesKristen Clauss vs Sara Mize6-0, 6-1
2024-07-08vs BP GREENWon 20
W#1 Female SinglesAlyssa Cormack vs Celine Fucci6-1, 6-1
W#2 Female SinglesKristen Clauss vs Amy Dre6-1, 6-0
2024-06-27vs MVCC REDWon 30
W#1 Female DoublesHolland Asbach / Everett Johnson vs Emily Brennan / Lindsay Gordon2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 Female SinglesKristen Clauss vs Kaylyn Piaskowy6-4, 6-3
W#2 Female SinglesEmma Tiernon vs Danielle Rooney7-5, 6-2
2024-06-20vs TTA BLUESplit 11
W#1 Female DoublesMary Virginia Simpson / Holland Asbach vs Kelsa Morgan / Tara Tovar6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 Female SinglesEmma Tiernon vs Jordan Smith6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2024-06-06vs MVCC REDWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesEmma Tiernon / Molly Myers vs Hilary Murphy / Lauren Anderson6-3, 6-3
W#2 Female SinglesAlyssa Cormack vs Lindsay Gordon6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Kristen Clauss
usually #2 Female Singles 67%, also #1 Female Singles 33% · published 4
3.43
Alyssa Cormack
usually #1 Female Singles 67%, also #2 Female Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Everett Johnson
published
3.18
Holland Asbach
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
3.13
Margaret Dowling
published
3.13
Emma Tiernon
usually #2 Female Singles 67%, also #1 Female Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Margaret Dowling + Kristen Clauss123 matchesnot enough data
Alyssa Cormack + Kristen Clauss303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kristen Clauss
63W–19L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
3.5
Alyssa Cormack
28W–17L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.43
Everett Johnson
19W–13L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Holland Asbach
46W–32L career · 3 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Mary Virginia Simpson
8W–9L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.16
Margaret Dowling
7W–14L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Emma Tiernon
48W–26L career · 3 lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.