Teams

Caffeine & Courts

2026 FALL DAYTIME DOUBLES - BOISE · TV

14 players · average NTRP 3.19 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings4 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sunrise Smashers000000
2Caffeine & Courts000000
3Fall Fusion000000
4CC Day Timers000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Tanya Vaughan
published 4
3.29
Mary Chodroff
published 3.5
3.23
Andrea Reynolds
published 3.5
3.13
Lora Bonser
published 3.5
3.12
3.00
2.95
Kim Agler
published 3
2.94
Jodi Whittaker
published 3
2.89
Valencia Bilyeu
published 3
2.81
Cindy Haroian
published 3
2.80
Teresa Lyon
published 3
2.78
Michelle Brack
published 3
2.74
Christa Napier
published 3
Jill Mckinney
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Teresa Lyon + Lora Bonser8361% games+4.2% vs expected
Jodi Whittaker + Michelle McSorley8653% games+3.1% vs expected
Teresa Lyon + Kim Agler18858% games−0.4% vs expected
Cindy Haroian + Valencia Bilyeu272153% games−0.7% vs expected
Cindy Haroian + Michelle McSorley3449% games−4.3% vs expected
Lora Bonser + Valencia Bilyeu71049% games−5.7% vs expected
Teresa Lyon + Jill Mckinney18860% gamesnot enough data
Kim Agler + Jill Mckinney12664% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tanya Vaughan
148W–143L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Mary Chodroff
115W–104L career · no lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Andrea Reynolds
84W–122L career · no lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Lora Bonser
117W–110L career · no lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.13
3
Kristina Winterling
113W–77L career · no lines in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.12
3
Michelle McSorley
72W–49L career · no lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Kim Agler
89W–82L career · no lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Jodi Whittaker
59W–54L career · no lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Valencia Bilyeu
145W–124L career · no lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Cindy Haroian
76W–100L career · no lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Teresa Lyon
167W–112L career · no lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Michelle Brack
33W–33L career · no lines in 2026
1%94%5%
2.78
3
Christa Napier
81W–65L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%2%
2.74
Jill Mckinney
67W–47L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.