Teams

HRCA-N RED

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-16vs GR TEALWon 40
W#1 DoublesHelen Lazzell / Jane Jussila vs Catherine Hosteny / Jamie Lauters6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAlesha Watson vs EMILY JENNINGS6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmy Keller / Danielle Butler vs Vicki Kern / Heather Killeen3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHeather Coker / Terry Fiala vs Carrie Hantge / Abby Letourneau6-3, 6-1
2026-07-09vs PH GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesHelen Lazzell / Jane Jussila vs Brittany Cirbo / Kimberly Miller3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesCarey Madsen vs Jennifer Moxon4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCarrie Erickson / Danielle Butler vs Rebecca Grace / Brenna Mielenz6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesAlesha Watson / Rachel Feiman vs Jody Alexander / Kristin McDonald6-1, 6-1
2026-07-02vs LEBTC GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesJane Jussila / Amy Keller vs Audrey Moskowitz / Kim Belitz6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAlesha Watson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCarey Madsen / Terry Fiala vs Marcy Butler / Jane Braaten3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRachel Feiman / Danielle Butler vs Anne Fanganello / Nicola Zalkind6-4, 7-6
2026-06-25vs KC-CC GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesHelen Lazzell / Jane Jussila vs Laura Grush / Dawn Robbins6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAlesha Watson vs Kristina DeHerrera7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmy Keller / Carrie Erickson vs Jami Jensen / Sara VanHook6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTerry Fiala / Carey Madsen vs Sharon Seemann / Kit Fitzgerald6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2026-06-18vs SS-LGT NAVYLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmy Keller / Carrie Erickson vs Jan Bennett / Jessica Sutton3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesTerry Fiala / Helen Lazzell vs Karen Knight / Sharon Johnson3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDanielle Butler / Tara Simmons vs Rhonda Struman / Mary Berg6-2, 6-2
2026-06-11vs CCC NAVYSplit 22
W#1 DoublesAmy Keller / Carrie Erickson vs Amy Gautreau / Lynne Paris6-3, 7-5
L#1 SinglesAlesha Watson vs Rebecca Goodyear2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTerry Fiala / Jane Jussila vs Karissa Savage / Brooke Cannelongo6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRachel Feiman / Heather Coker vs Mikelle Smith / Amanda Feldman4-6, 2-6
2026-06-04vs KC-CC NAVYSplit 22
W#1 DoublesCarrie Erickson / Terry Fiala vs Ellen Sprague / Ann Rhoads6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAlesha Watson vs Jill M Shields1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTara Simmons / Carey Madsen vs Crystal Adams / Lynn Adams4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesHeather Coker / Rachel Feiman vs Courtney Baraglia / Tara McEnroe6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Carrie Erickson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.48
Helen Lazzell
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.30
Rachel Feiman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Carey Madsen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Amy Keller
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.27
Jane Jussila
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.27
Terry Fiala
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Alesha Watson
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.22
Tara Simmons
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.19
Danielle Butler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.11
Heather Coker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane Jussila + Carrie Erickson5073% games+12.3% vs expected
Helen Lazzell + Amy Keller4456% games+6.0% vs expected
Heather Coker + Carrie Erickson8363% games+5.8% vs expected
Terry Fiala + Carey Madsen7458% games+5.4% vs expected
Helen Lazzell + Jane Jussila301458% games+4.5% vs expected
Danielle Butler + Amy Keller5156% games+2.5% vs expected
Rachel Feiman + Heather Coker8451% games+2.4% vs expected
Danielle Butler + Tara Simmons10555% games+1.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carrie Erickson
34W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
3.56
3.5
Helen Lazzell
102W–54L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Rachel Feiman
80W–68L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Carey Madsen
10W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Amy Keller
33W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Jane Jussila
57W–33L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Terry Fiala
93W–82L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Alesha Watson
113W–69L career · 6 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Tara Simmons
26W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Danielle Butler
45W–24L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Heather Coker
83W–38L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.