Teams

KC-CC GREEN

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.44 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-16vs SS-LGT NAVYLost 03
L#1 DoublesDawn Robbins / Laura Grush vs Sharon Johnson / Karen Knight0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJoelle Arne / Sharon Seemann vs Sharon Naylor / Gwen Olsen6-0, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSandy Courtney / Kit Fitzgerald vs Jan Bennett / Valerie Norris2-6, 4-6
2026-07-09vs KC-CC NAVYLost 04
L#1 DoublesDawn Robbins / Laura Grush vs Crystal Adams / Ann Rhoads5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSandy Courtney vs Jill M Shields1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSara VanHook / Jami Jensen vs Ellen Sprague / Lynn Adams2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGwen Riley / Kit Fitzgerald vs Beth Eiseman / Tara McEnroe4-6, 3-6
2026-07-02vs PH GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesSandy Courtney / Sharon Seemann vs Katie Mohler / Rebecca Grace6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJoelle Arne vs Jennifer Moxon3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesHeidi Griffiths / Laura Grush vs Kristin McDonald / Simne Langton6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJami Jensen / Sara VanHook vs Kimberly Miller / Sarah Wadsworth6-1, 6-2
2026-06-25vs HRCA-N REDLost 04
L#1 DoublesLaura Grush / Dawn Robbins vs Helen Lazzell / Jane Jussila1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKristina DeHerrera vs Alesha Watson5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJami Jensen / Sara VanHook vs Amy Keller / Carrie Erickson3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSharon Seemann / Kit Fitzgerald vs Terry Fiala / Carey Madsen1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-06-18vs CCC NAVYLost 13
L#1 DoublesJoelle Arne / Dawn Robbins vs Amy Gautreau / Mikelle Smith3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesSharon Seemann vs Erin Wiley2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSandy Courtney / Heidi Griffiths vs Karissa Savage / Tonya Berry7-5, 7-6
L#3 DoublesGwen Riley / Susan Khanna vs Elizabeth Whittaker / Rebecca Goodyear1-6, 1-6
2026-06-11vs GR TEALLost 13
W#1 DoublesSharon Seemann / Laura Grush vs EMILY JENNINGS / Catherine Hosteny7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKristina DeHerrera vs Jamie Lauters1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesGwen Riley / Heidi Griffiths vs Sydney Green / Abby Letourneau4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJami Jensen / Kit Fitzgerald vs Lisa Herring / Vicki Kern2-6, 2-6
2026-06-04vs LEBTC GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesHeidi Griffiths / Gwen Riley vs Nancy Montini / Carol Parrish6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSandy Courtney vs Kristin Alexander3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJoelle Arne / Sara VanHook vs Nicola Zalkind / Diana Nice6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJami Jensen / Susan Khanna vs Marcy Butler / Jane Braaten3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Joelle Arne
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.42
Kristina DeHerrera
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.34
Laura Grush
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.21
Sharon Seemann
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.16
Sara VanHook
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Dawn Robbins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Sandy Courtney
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.10
Heidi Griffiths
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.08
Gwen Riley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.00
Jami Jensen
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.98
Susan Khanna
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Kit Fitzgerald
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandy Courtney + Sharon Seemann3358% games+10.9% vs expected
Sara VanHook + Joelle Arne412455% games+4.8% vs expected
Sara VanHook + Sandy Courtney7258% games+4.7% vs expected
Heidi Griffiths + Sharon Seemann2545% games+1.5% vs expected
Sandy Courtney + Heidi Griffiths6550% games+1.4% vs expected
Sara VanHook + Jami Jensen3549% games+0.3% vs expected
Jami Jensen + Sandy Courtney2547% games−0.7% vs expected
Heidi Griffiths + Laura Grush3350% games−3.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Joelle Arne
64W–36L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.44
Kristina DeHerrera
18W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%72%27%
3.42
3.5
Laura Grush
59W–68L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Sharon Seemann
52W–66L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Sara VanHook
74W–62L career · 4 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.16
3.5
Dawn Robbins
8W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Sandy Courtney
71W–80L career · 5 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Heidi Griffiths
50W–59L career · 4 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.10
3.5
Gwen Riley
47W–71L career · 4 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.08
Jami Jensen
11W–27L career · 5 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.00
Susan Khanna
4W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.98
3
Kit Fitzgerald
28W–53L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.