Teams

PRKR GREEN

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.12 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-31vs SSLT TEALLost 01
L#3 DoublesPhuong Banh / Susan Kim vs Sara Percival / Rachel Austin3-6, 1-6
2022-05-25vs PRKR TEALWon 32
W#1 DoublesSusan Kim / Leena Keshwani vs Annette Knoll / Samantha Matthews5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRenae Ludrick vs Breanna McCracken3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKirsten Despain / Karen Bielenberg vs Christine Strang / Judi Puccini7-6, 6-4
L#2 SinglesPhuong Banh vs Urmie Mroz5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCindi Turchik / Lorie Whalen vs Susan Goldman / Daria Opekunova6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2022-05-21vs VCC GREENLost 13
L#1 DoublesKaren Bielenberg / Cindi Turchik vs Cheryl Georg / Diane Kelly3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLorie Whalen / Danita Geise vs Yvette Vreeman / Emily Yeingst4-6, 6-6
L#2 SinglesPhuong Banh vs Jill Savela0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKirsten Despain / Shelley Hanna vs Barbee Riehl / Shelbee Riehl6-2, 6-1
2022-05-16vs SSLT MAROONWon 32
W#1 DoublesLeena Keshwani / Kirsten Despain vs Caroline Landgraff / Kelly Kinder6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesRenae Ludrick vs Jessica Schulze7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesDanita Geise / Cindi Turchik vs Laura Nuss / Laurie Porter4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesShelley Hanna vs Martha Rubi-Byers3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPhuong Banh / Susan Kim vs Elizabeth Bell / Julie Diep4-6, 0-6
2022-05-09vs WC BLUEWon 32
L#1 DoublesKaren Bielenberg / Cindi Turchik vs Jennifer Woodrow / Jamie Gagne1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesRenae Ludrick vs Dana Sandberg2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesShelley Hanna / Kirsten Despain vs Rebecca Boxer / Lisa Knurek6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesLeena Keshwani vs Laura Ream6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDanita Geise / Lorie Whalen vs Erin Herman / Mary Brady6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2022-04-25vs CCV REDLost 14
L#1 DoublesLeena Keshwani / Cindi Turchik vs Jill Filene / Julie Holt2-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesShelley Hanna vs Melanie Weitzenfeld2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKirsten Despain / Karen Bielenberg vs Sari Nicholson / Lisa Hardin6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesRenae Ludrick vs Christy Battaglia4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPhuong Banh / Lorie Whalen vs Laura L Marturano / Fernanda Solis1-6, 0-6
2022-04-18vs PCC SILVERLost 23
L#1 DoublesCindi Turchik / Leena Keshwani vs Mary Pearce / Marybeth Touchton4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesRenae Ludrick vs Laura Wren0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Bielenberg / Kirsten Despain vs Sandra Liberati / Darlene Odean3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesShelley Hanna vs Carolyn Watson4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLorie Whalen / Danita Geise vs Patricia Dutton / Diane Matava6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Danita Geise
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Leena Keshwani
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
3.11
Phuong Banh
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
Cindi Turchik
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.62
Kirsten Despain
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
2.60
Karen Bielenberg
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.55
Roxanne Corbett
published
Lorie Whalen
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Renae Ludrick
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Shelley Hanna
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lorie Whalen + Shelley Hanna8157% games+9.8% vs expected
Cindi Turchik + Leena Keshwani7451% games+2.8% vs expected
Cindi Turchik + Shelley Hanna3351% games+2.4% vs expected
Kirsten Despain + Karen Bielenberg131052% games+0.4% vs expected
Shelley Hanna + Leena Keshwani314 matchesnot enough data
Lorie Whalen + Renae Ludrick033 matchesnot enough data
Lorie Whalen + Cindi Turchik123 matchesnot enough data
Lorie Whalen + Karen Bielenberg213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Danita Geise
44W–19L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%83%16%
3.37
3
Leena Keshwani
129W–45L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%5%95%
3.22
Phuong Banh
31W–32L career · 5 lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.11
3
Cindi Turchik
37W–61L career · type A · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kirsten Despain
27W–32L career · 6 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
2.62
3
Karen Bielenberg
38W–54L career · 5 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
2.60
Roxanne Corbett
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
0%36%64%
2.55
Lorie Whalen
18W–35L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Renae Ludrick
13W–10L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Shelley Hanna
37W–33L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.