Teams

WC BLUE

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 3.25 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-06-02vs VCC GREENWon 32
L#1 DoublesRebecca Boxer / Dana Sandberg vs Whitney Berger / Diana Miller0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesAmy Wiedeman vs Amy Bergan6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChristine Mosch / Stephanie Burt vs Diane Kelly / Cheryl Georg6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMary Brady vs Erika Rippee6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesErin Herman / SUSAN MORAVEK vs Shelbee Riehl / Barbee Riehl6-1, 6-7, 0-1
2022-05-25vs CCV REDLost 14
L#1 DoublesLisa Knurek / Erin Herman vs Julie Holt / Laura L Marturano2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJamie Gagne vs Melanie Weitzenfeld6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesStephanie Burt / Jennifer Woodrow vs Patricia Colella / Sari Nicholson7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAmy Wiedeman vs Christy Battaglia4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesChristine Mosch / SUSAN MORAVEK vs Lisa Hardin / Jamie Tamminga6-7, 3-6
2022-05-16vs PCC SILVERWon 41
W#1 DoublesDana Sandberg / Amy Wiedeman vs Sandra Liberati / Marybeth Touchton7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLisa Knurek vs Mary Pearce5-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesLaura Ream / SUSAN MORAVEK vs Donna Lollar / Laura Wren6-3, 7-6
W#2 SinglesJennifer Woodrow vs Carolyn Watson5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChristine Mosch / Mary Brady vs Patricia Dutton / Darlene Odean1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-05-10vs PRKR TEALWon 50
W#1 DoublesJennifer Woodrow / Rebecca Boxer vs Annette Knoll / Samantha Matthews7-5, 7-5
W#1 SinglesJamie Gagne vs Urmie Mroz6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMary Brady / Lisa Knurek vs Andrea Vickers / Christine Strang6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesDana Sandberg vs Daria Opekunova6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesErin Herman / Laura Ream vs Judi Puccini / Susan Goldman6-3, 6-2
2022-05-09vs PRKR GREENLost 23
W#1 DoublesJennifer Woodrow / Jamie Gagne vs Karen Bielenberg / Cindi Turchik6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesDana Sandberg vs Renae Ludrick6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRebecca Boxer / Lisa Knurek vs Shelley Hanna / Kirsten Despain2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesLaura Ream vs Leena Keshwani1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesErin Herman / Mary Brady vs Danita Geise / Lorie Whalen4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-04-25vs SSLT MAROONWon 41
W#1 DoublesAmy Wiedeman / Jamie Gagne vs Jessica Schulze / Martha Rubi-Byers6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesDana Sandberg vs Denise Hawkins6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesStephanie Burt / Christine Mosch vs Laurie Porter / Laura Nuss6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesLisa Knurek vs Karen Frood6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLaura Ream / Mary Brady vs Susan Carter / Julie Diep2-6, 1-6
2022-04-18vs SSLT TEALWon 41
L#1 DoublesStephanie Burt / Dana Sandberg vs Sheila Marino / Michelle Woolley4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAmy Wiedeman vs Sara Percival6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJennifer Woodrow / Christine Mosch vs Beth Reedy / Alyssa Jenson6-3, 7-5
W#2 SinglesJamie Gagne vs Amy Koldyke6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSUSAN MORAVEK / Mary Brady vs Rachel Austin / Stephanie Price7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings52 teams · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DTC PURPLE7030514226
2GAC PURPLE6024618195
3BCC GOLD6130520245
4SSHP BLUE6126923250
5BM BLUE61201533265
6WC BLUE52231231305
7CVTA BLACK52201532267
8BTA ORANGE52181734274
9SS-G YELLOW52211434317
10APR BLUE52201536304
11BRMST YELLOW52191636318
12ATC GREEN43231227255
13GTC YELLOW43211431269
14WP BLACK43201532318
15KC-RH PINK43221332280
16GTC TEAL43181738320
17PRKR RED43181742313
18GTC PINK43161945333
19PTC PINK33151533254
20CHCC RED34181736297
21CVTA GOLD34161939306
22BCC PINK34181740309
23SKY GREY34171840317
24TTA GOLD34171842335
25PCC GOLD34171842326
26GR NAVY34152045362
27KNO GOLD34152045351
28SSLT GOLD24111941280
29LEBTC YELLOW25171838317
30KC-CC NAVY25161940320
31GPTC RED25161944344
32VC TEAL25152044324
33CM ORANGE25161945343
34HV SILVER25152045312
35PRKR TEAL25132245345
36CACI GREEN25142146321
37PCC SILVER25142146342
38BRMST SILVER25122350339
39CCC GREEN25102556363
40HFII ORANGE1491635248
41SSD BLUE16132248356
42CM NAVY16132248350
43SSLT MAROON16122351356
44EM YELLOW16112451367
45HIW MAROON16112451360
46TTA PINK16102551357
47CVTA NAVY16112454375
48HW YELLOW1653062388
49CVTA ORANGE07102552351
50GR SILVER0792655365
51MC NAVY0782756366
52RMTC BLACK0762958362

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.09
Jamie Gagne
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.04
Stephanie Burt
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.04
Dana Sandberg
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.93
Amy Wiedeman
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.92
Rebecca Boxer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.76
Lisa Knurek
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
2.68
Erin Herman
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.65
SUSAN MORAVEK
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.63
Mary Brady
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.50
Laura Ream
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Christine Mosch
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Jennifer Woodrow
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Paula Schmitt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dana Sandberg + Jennifer Woodrow6259% games+9.2% vs expected
Mary Brady + Christine Mosch5158% games+9.0% vs expected
Jamie Gagne + Jennifer Woodrow7062% games+7.7% vs expected
Laura Ream + Lisa Knurek7456% games+6.7% vs expected
Lisa Knurek + SUSAN MORAVEK11754% games+3.8% vs expected
Laura Ream + SUSAN MORAVEK10951% games+2.3% vs expected
Dana Sandberg + Jamie Gagne9451% games+1.9% vs expected
Stephanie Burt + Jamie Gagne2344% games−6.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jamie Gagne
75W–50L career · 5 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.09
Stephanie Burt
50W–53L career · 4 lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.04
3.5
Dana Sandberg
47W–38L career · 6 lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.04
3.5
Amy Wiedeman
36W–30L career · 5 lines in 2022
69%31%<1%
2.93
Rebecca Boxer
28W–47L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Lisa Knurek
52W–46L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Erin Herman
18W–33L career · 4 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68
3
SUSAN MORAVEK
63W–52L career · 4 lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
2.65
Mary Brady
35W–49L career · 6 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
2.63
Laura Ream
48W–47L career · 4 lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
2.50
Christine Mosch
12W–13L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jennifer Woodrow
45W–37L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Paula Schmitt
6W–14L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.