Teams

THolwager (Life Time)

2022 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 4.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 4.06 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-05-12vs LUntener (Queens)Won 10
W#3 DoublesBrenda Sweeney / Kristen Shaeffer vs Stacey Whitney / Fe Read6-2, 6-4
2022-04-28vs KHart (Blakeney)Won 10
W#3 DoublesJ Lowe / Kristen Shaeffer vs Katy Hart / Rosalie ORourke6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2022-04-21vs CGoldblatt/MParker (OPRC)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKristen Shaeffer / Brenda Sweeney vs Michelle Ziewacz / Shelley Brunker4-6, 5-7
2022-03-24vs SReynolds (Queens Complex)Won 10
W#3 DoublesBrenda Sweeney / Kristen Shaeffer vs Elizabeth Strack / MacKenzie Roberts6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2022-03-10vs PDonoghue (Matthews)Won 10
W#3 DoublesBrenda Sweeney / Kristen Shaeffer vs Paula Donoghue / Donna Musante6-4, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Emily Weigel
published 4
3.94
Christina Peterson
published 4.5
Huiying Cui
published 4
3.75
J Lowe
published 4
3.74
Lee Page
published
3.74
Anna Kamenova
published 4
3.73
Cameron Green
published 4
3.69
Kathleen Johnstone
published
3.65
Trista Holwager
published 4
3.58
Jennifer Lundberg
published
3.53
Brenda Sweeney
published 4
3.50
Kristen Shaeffer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christina Peterson + Jennifer Lundberg2344% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Emily Weigel
163W–81L career · no lines in 2022
<1%47%53%
4.01
4.5
Christina Peterson
100W–61L career · no lines in 2022
67%33%<1%
3.94
4
Christine Pringle
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Huiying Cui
3W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
J Lowe
12W–4L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
Lee Page
47W–45L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Anna Kamenova
70W–57L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Cameron Green
6W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Kathleen Johnstone
33W–38L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Trista Holwager
81W–68L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
Jennifer Lundberg
71W–77L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.58
4
Brenda Sweeney
8W–11L career · no lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
3.53
Kristen Shaeffer
76W–37L career · 5 lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
3.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.