Teams

Indy A55 8.0W CRC Eicher

Summer USTA Central Indiana Adult 55 & Over · CIN Indy 55 & Over 8.0 Women, S

10 players · average NTRP 4.50 / CENTRAL INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-08-17vs Indy A55 8.0W NCHS MarshallWon 20
W#1 DoublesJoan Eicher / Terri Shea vs Lucy Lane / Angela Marshall6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesPamela Cousins / Michelle Burns vs Melissa Stein / Erin Young6-3, 6-3
2026-08-10vs Indy A55 8.0W CRC TrottLost 02
L#1 DoublesJulie Arnold / Joan Eicher vs Stacey Harmon / Linda Richman3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMyra Endris / Beth Smith vs Connie Glass / Melinda Brueggemann3-6, 6-7
2026-08-03vs Indy A55 8.0W IRCD PruittSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLaurie Lubs / Donna Sullivan vs ANN KEATON / Renee Noe1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLisa Enright / Terri Shea vs Teresa Keller / Hema Suresh6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2026-07-27vs Indy A55 8.0W IRCE CoyneLost 02
L#1 DoublesJoan Eicher / Lisa Enright vs Elizabeth Lacy / Belinda Strobel3-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPamela Cousins / Gayle Carlson vs Marianne Vorhees / Deborah Kuratko4-6, 3-6
2026-07-20vs Indy A55 8.0W IRCD GuptaLost 03
L#1 DoublesJoan Eicher / Julie Arnold vs Pamela Kane / Lisa Schneider6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTerri Shea / Beth Smith vs Julie Burns / DEBORAH HAMEL1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Reifeis / Michelle Burns vs Marylu Kosiarek / Marsha Norris6-7, 4-6
2026-07-13vs Indy A55 8.0W NCHS MarshallWon 20
W#1 DoublesJoan Eicher / Lisa Enright vs Lucy Lane / Angela Marshall7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRobyn Glushik / Laurie Lubs vs Michele McCarthy / Erin Young6-2, 6-4
2026-07-06vs Indy A55 8.0W CRC TrottLost 03
L#1 DoublesJulie Arnold / Joan Eicher vs Kristi Moschel / Colleen ONeal2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesTerri Shea / Beth Smith vs Lynn Hobbs / Cindy Martin4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDonna Sullivan / Lisa Enright vs Tia Bennett-Faro / Emeline Davis2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-06-29vs Indy A55 8.0W IRCD PruittLost 03
L#1 DoublesGayle Carlson / Lisa Enright vs ANN KEATON / Renee Noe0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJoan Eicher / Myra Endris vs Martha Harker / Vicki Valandra2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Reifeis / Lisa Peterson vs Belinda Denning / Lisa Pruitt2-6, 3-6
2026-06-22vs Indy A55 8.0W IRCE CoyneSplit 11
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Reifeis / Beth Smith vs Brenda Cox / Marianne Vorhees1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesGayle Carlson / Laurie Lubs vs Carmen Cudiamat / Kimberly Dalton7-5, 7-6
2026-06-15vs Indy A55 8.0W IRCD GuptaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJulie Arnold / Joan Eicher vs Ruth Grissom / Lisa Schneider1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGayle Carlson / Lisa Enright vs Marylu Kosiarek / Angela Ostrowski6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CIN Indy 55 & Over 8.0 Women, S have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Elizabeth Reifeis
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.79
Joan Eicher
usually #1 Doubles 73%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published
3.64
Terri Shea
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.60
Pamela Cousins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Lisa Enright
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.25
Myra Endris
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Julie Arnold
published
Laurie Lubs
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Lisa Peterson
published
Michelle Burns
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Myra Endris + Terri Shea6754% games+5.1% vs expected
Myra Endris + Julie Arnold3648% games−9.3% vs expected
Lisa Enright + Pamela Cousins0534% games−19.9% vs expected
Laurie Lubs + Michelle Burns224 matchesnot enough data
Laurie Lubs + Pamela Cousins404 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Burns + Pamela Cousins314 matchesnot enough data
Myra Endris + Lisa Enright134 matchesnot enough data
Laurie Lubs + Terri Shea123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Elizabeth Reifeis
68W–50L career · 3 lines in 2026
84%16%<1%
3.87
Joan Eicher
197W–123L career · 11 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.79
Terri Shea
99W–100L career · 4 lines in 2026
14%85%<1%
3.64
Pamela Cousins
48W–56L career · 2 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.60
Lisa Enright
44W–86L career · 6 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
3.51
Myra Endris
81W–149L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
Julie Arnold
46W–51L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Laurie Lubs
51W–39L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lisa Peterson
30W–40L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Michelle Burns
54W–50L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.