Teams

Game Set Sunset

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over - Ventura · Ventura - Women 4.0 WE

14 players · average NTRP 3.90 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-06-29vs Royal Court QueensWon 10
W#1 DoublesWyne Quinn / Sharon Li vs Ashley Tanger / Yolanda Johnson6-3, 6-1
2025-06-08vs AV HurricanesWon 10
W#3 DoublesSharon Li / Wyne Quinn vs Julie Perron / Debbie Pittenger6-1, 6-3
2025-06-07vs Spring Ojai PixiesLost 02
L#2 DoublesWyne Quinn / Ina Kim vs Daisy Carlson / Jennifer Soller3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSANDI WISE / Sherry Meinhart vs Heather Miller / Marie Brown3-6, 5-7
2025-05-18vs Royally FunLost 01
L#1 DoublesSuzie Yamamoto / Wyne Quinn vs Stacey Iwata / Lorene Miller6-7, 0-6
2025-04-19vs Mission Oaks Smart AcesLost 01
L#2 DoublesSuzie Yamamoto / Wyne Quinn vs Helina Wu / Tracee Nilsson7-6, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 4.0 WE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Cheryl Kalinke
published 4
3.70
Tracey Ackourey
published
3.69
Mia de Leon
published
3.68
Suzie Yamamoto
published
3.67
Deanna Romero
published 4
3.67
Rebecca Drake
published
3.64
Denise Gelfand
published 4
3.58
Wyne Quinn
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.57
Sharon Li
published
3.41
Ina Kim
published
3.39
SANDI WISE
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 38% · published 3.5
3.25
Sherry Meinhart
published
3.00
Tanya Thompson
published
Susan Dahlberg
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

SANDI WISE + Wyne Quinn7461% gamesnot enough data
Tracey Ackourey + Deanna Romero213 matchesnot enough data
SANDI WISE + Tanya Thompson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cheryl Kalinke
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
Tracey Ackourey
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Mia de Leon
19W–22L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
Suzie Yamamoto
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Deanna Romero
3W–13L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
Rebecca Drake
2W–10L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Denise Gelfand
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
4
Wyne Quinn
103W–92L career · 5 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
Sharon Li
13W–10L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
Ina Kim
14W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%26%
3.41
3.5
SANDI WISE
187W–162L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Sherry Meinhart
11W–6L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25
Tanya Thompson
2W–12L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.00
Susan Dahlberg
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.