Teams

Spring Ojai Pixies

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over - Ventura · Ventura - Women 4.0 WE

18 players · average NTRP 4.05 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-29vs AV HurricanesWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Sutman / Joy Henning vs Denise Modglin / Corrine Weiner6-2, 6-3
2025-06-25vs Royal Court QueensWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoy Henning / Jennifer Voorlas vs Ashley Tanger / Kai Tanget6-1, 6-0
2025-06-22vs Mission Oaks Smart AcesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJoy Henning / Debra Becker vs Deanne Saucerman / Jennifer Cates5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGhazala Trotter / Katrina Rice Schmidt vs Helina Wu / Kasia Domenech1-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesJennifer Sutman / Sandy Hutchins vs Nathalie Smith / Lola Tennison6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKathrina Cruz / Jennifer Soller vs Jacqui Burge / Barbara Connelly7-5, 7-6
2025-06-08vs Malibu Smokin AcesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDaisy Carlson / Kathrina Cruz vs Kathleen Feig / Kelly Gores7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJamie Culhane / Ghazala Trotter vs Monica Bjork / Tina Jackson1-6, 0-2
2025-06-07vs Game Set SunsetWon 20
W#1 DoublesJennifer Sutman / Sandy Hutchins vs Susan Dahlberg / Denise Gelfand6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDaisy Carlson / Jennifer Soller vs Wyne Quinn / Ina Kim6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2025-05-10vs Royally FunSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJennifer Convery / Jennifer Sutman vs Carol Choy / Kristen Lee6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJoy Henning / Ghazala Trotter vs Skylar Sabetta / Cindy Baw4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-05-04vs Out of WACSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJennifer Sutman / Jennifer Convery vs Ramona Halloran / Lisa Doan6-0, 7-5
L#3 DoublesKirsten Johnston / Jamie Culhane vs Karen Rosenberg / Annie Farkas6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 4.0 WE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.35
Jennifer Convery
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.09
Jennifer Voorlas
published
3.84
Jennifer Soller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.83
Daisy Carlson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.82
Sandy Hutchins
published
3.78
Jennifer Sutman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Joy Henning
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.71
Courtney Andrews
published 4
3.64
Kathrina Cruz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.63
Kirsten Johnston
published
3.60
Jamie Culhane
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Tahnie Toland
published
3.52
Ghazala Trotter
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.45
Kelly Jensen
published
3.32
Lea Gonzalez
published
3.28
Debra Becker
published 4
3.17
Heidi Bensinger
published
3.15
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathrina Cruz + Daisy Carlson9263% games+12.6% vs expected
Joy Henning + Daisy Carlson361159% games−3.3% vs expected
Joy Henning + Jennifer Sutman13358% games−4.1% vs expected
Jennifer Convery + Jennifer Soller15562% gamesnot enough data
Daisy Carlson + Jennifer Soller9265% gamesnot enough data
Joy Henning + Jennifer Soller4353% gamesnot enough data
Kathrina Cruz + Jennifer Sutman2348% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Sutman + Jennifer Soller3260% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jennifer Convery
47W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
4.35
Jennifer Voorlas
14W–10L career · no lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
4.09
4
Jennifer Soller
108W–67L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.84
4
Daisy Carlson
185W–93L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Sandy Hutchins
14W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Jennifer Sutman
95W–58L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Joy Henning
166W–102L career · 7 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Courtney Andrews
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Kathrina Cruz
221W–229L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
Kirsten Johnston
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Jamie Culhane
68W–50L career · 2 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
Tahnie Toland
18W–24L career · no lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.57
4
Ghazala Trotter
188W–183L career · 3 lines in 2025
43%56%<1%
3.52
Kelly Jensen
25W–36L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.45
Lea Gonzalez
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
4
Debra Becker
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
3.28
Heidi Bensinger
11W–12L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%1%
3.17
Katrina Rice Schmidt
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.