Teams

Malibu Smokin Aces

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over - Ventura · Ventura - Women 4.0 WE

17 players · average NTRP 4.05 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-29vs Royally FunWon 30
W#1 DoublesGina Odian / Maureen Weston vs Cindy Baw / Mardie Villadiego7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKathleen Feig / Michelle Jackson vs Lan Chao / Teresa Zobrist6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesVicki Levin / Tina Jackson vs Claudine Stanley / Ana Gorman6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-06-22vs Royal Court QueensSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMaureen Weston / Gina Odian vs Lillian Stewart / Mariana Sullivan6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesRory Kennedy / Vicki Levin vs Ashley Tanger / Kai Tanget1-6, 1-6
2025-06-14vs Out of WACSplit 11
L#2 DoublesMonica Bjork / Vicki Levin vs Tanja Daniel / Lisa Doan6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKathleen Feig / Maureen Weston vs Karen Walker / Annie Farkas6-2, 6-3
2025-06-08vs Spring Ojai PixiesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKathleen Feig / Kelly Gores vs Daisy Carlson / Kathrina Cruz5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesVicki Levin / Gina Odian vs Debra Becker / Marie Brown6-0, 6-4
2025-05-24vs Game Set SunsetWon 20
W#1 DoublesKelly Gores / Kathleen Feig vs Denise Gelfand / Deanna Romero6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesVicki Levin / Gina Odian vs Sharon Li / Cheryl Kalinke6-1, 6-1
2025-05-17vs AV HurricanesWon 10
W#1 DoublesVicki Levin / Gina Odian vs Erin MacKie / Susie Shoop6-1, 6-4
2025-05-03vs Mission Oaks Smart AcesWon 21
L#1 DoublesAimee Butcher / Maureen Weston vs Deanne Saucerman / Alexis Saucerman4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesKathleen Feig vs Kasia Domenech6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTina Jackson / Vicki Levin vs Tobi Schneider / Elena Boyagian6-3, 6-3
L#1 DoublesGina Odian / Maureen Weston vs Nathalie Smith / Lola Tennison0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKathleen Feig / Michelle Jackson vs Debra Jordan / Yang Ja Ballard4-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 4.0 WE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.14
Thea Lasky
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.05
Kathleen Feig
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
4.03
Gina Odian
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.83
Maureen Weston
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.81
Kelly Gores
published
3.81
Erin von Watts
published 4
3.81
Monica Bjork
published
3.80
Aimee Butcher
published 4
3.79
Vicki Levin
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.75
Samantha Cramer
published
3.70
Denise Sheffield
published 4
3.69
Denise Gocke
published 4
3.65
Amanda Keston
published 4
3.46
Michelle Jackson
published
3.31
Rory Kennedy
published
Tina Jackson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vicki Levin + Monica Bjork5069% games+7.0% vs expected
Maureen Weston + Gina Odian15658% games+6.3% vs expected
Michelle Jackson + Kathleen Feig10757% games+5.9% vs expected
Gina Odian + Erin von Watts14264% games+2.1% vs expected
Maureen Weston + Vicki Levin12954% games−1.7% vs expected
Vicki Levin + Gina Odian17657% games−3.6% vs expected
Maureen Weston + Kathleen Feig17857% games−11.6% vs expected
Vicki Levin + Kathleen Feig2745% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Thea Lasky
57W–97L career · 1 line in 2025
15%85%<1%
4.14
4
Kathleen Feig
148W–95L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
4.05
4
Gina Odian
96W–35L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
4.03
4
Maureen Weston
107W–64L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.83
Kelly Gores
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.81
4
Erin von Watts
14W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%8%
3.81
Monica Bjork
14W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Aimee Butcher
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Vicki Levin
112W–114L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Geraldine Chollet
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Samantha Cramer
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Denise Sheffield
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Denise Gocke
72W–64L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Amanda Keston
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.65
Michelle Jackson
15W–10L career · no lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
3.46
Rory Kennedy
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Tina Jackson
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.