Teams

Lake Cane-Jensen

2025 ORANGESEMINOLE Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_4

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-30vs Heathrow-Pan- HuntersLost 01
L#2 DoublesAmanda Barritt / Paulo Victor Lima vs Yun Ling / Catherine Hwang3-6, 3-6
2025-05-16vs WPTC-RotjesLost 01
L#2 DoublesPaulo Victor Lima / Amanda Barritt vs Rikki Myers / Randolph Wisor6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2025-05-02vs ORANGE/Faubert/18&Over8.0MixedWon 10
W#3 DoublesJake Jensen / Amanda Barritt vs Luidgi Faubert / Itzel Sotorosa7-6, 7-5
2025-04-25vs Heathrow-Pan- HuntersLost 02
L#1 DoublesDaniele Engel / Humberto Engel vs Peter Vu / Donghui Zhang4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPaulo Victor Lima / Luciana Soares vs Sean Lu / Stella Liu6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-04-11vs WPTC-RotjesLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmanda Barritt / Jonathan Zelik vs Juan Carlos Rotjes / KARA COGGINS1-6, 1-6
2025-04-05vs Sanlando-MelendezLost 01
L#3 DoublesMarianna Coelho / Matheus Fontes Coelho vs Paul Ulep / Julie Davis2-6, 2-6
2024-05-18vs Sanlando-MelendezLost 01
L#1 DoublesJake Jensen / Amanda Barritt vs Sophie Blackwell / Raul Larrousse4-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
Marianna Coelho
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.26
Claire Fitzgerald
published 4.5
3.93
Luciana Soares
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
Amanda Barritt
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
Daniele Engel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Haley Wrona
published 4
Humberto Engel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.42
Mario Massad
published
3.32
Rachel Nguyen
published
Cassi Forbeck
published 3.5
Jake Jensen
published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Marianna Coelho
44W–63L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%74%26%
4.42
4.5
Claire Fitzgerald
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
4.26
Luciana Soares
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
71%29%<1%
3.93
4
Amanda Barritt
185W–123L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Daniele Engel
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4
Haley Wrona
35W–14L career · type M · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Humberto Engel
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mario Massad
26W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
Rachel Nguyen
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%0%
3.32
3.5
Cassi Forbeck
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Jake Jensen
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.