Teams

Net Smashers Couser RTC

2026 USTA League Tennis Adult 18 & Over Summer-RO · 3.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-07-22vs Chalmers/Wildfeuer RACLost 14
L#1 DoublesYuki Munden / Lori Julian vs Jodi Kruse / Jane Cerhan1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMadison Couser vs Sarah Chalmers3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJessica Balcom / Gabriella Bedekovicsne-Gajdos vs Kathryn Palen / Elizabeth Obert6-0, 7-5
L#2 SinglesTorrey Bakke vs Mabel Ryder7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTheresa Sampson Brown / Raelene Shufelt vs Diana Kelm / Lisa Teske1-6, 2-6
2026-07-15vs Chalmers/Wildfeuer RACWon 41
W#1 DoublesJessica Balcom / Torrey Bakke vs Jane Cerhan / Mary Johnson6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSarah Bauer vs Caitlin Morris6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMadison Couser / Jean Herda vs Caitlin Roth / Jessica Wang0-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesEvelyn Carroll vs Elizabeth Obert0-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMelanie Lyden / Theresa Sampson Brown vs Alice Lembach / Kathryn Palen6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2026-07-01vs Chalmers/Wildfeuer RACLost 14
L#1 DoublesMadison Couser / Gabriella Bedekovicsne-Gajdos vs Sarah Chalmers / Dawn Wildfeuer2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesSarah Bauer vs Mabel Ryder6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRaelene Shufelt / Jean Herda vs Mary Johnson / Anne Colby5-7, 2-6
L#2 SinglesJessica Balcom vs Diana Kelm4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTheresa Sampson Brown / Melanie Lyden vs Jane Cerhan / Kathryn Palen4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-06-24vs Chalmers/Wildfeuer RACLost 05
L#1 DoublesJessica Balcom / Madison Couser vs Jodi Kruse / Anne Colby4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesEvelyn Carroll vs Caitlin Roth4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Czaplewski / Gabriella Bedekovicsne-Gajdos vs Dawn Wildfeuer / Mary Johnson2-6, 0-4
L#2 SinglesMagdalena Geske vs Caitlin Morris0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTheresa Sampson Brown / Melanie Lyden vs Amy Crockett / Mabel Ryder2-6, 2-6
2026-06-17vs Chalmers/Wildfeuer RACLost 14
L#1 DoublesTorrey Bakke / Jessica Balcom vs Mary Johnson / Anne Colby6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSarah Bauer vs Elizabeth Obert6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesEvelyn Carroll / Lori Julian vs Jodi Kruse / Caitlin Roth4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesMagdalena Geske vs Mabel Ryder3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRaelene Shufelt / Melanie Lyden vs Alice Lembach / Lisa Teske7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2026-06-10vs Chalmers/Wildfeuer RACLost 23
W#1 DoublesYuki Munden / Jessica Balcom vs Mabel Ryder / Anne Colby6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTorrey Bakke vs Jessica Wang3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMadison Couser / Lori Julian vs Sarah Chalmers / Diana Kelm5-7, 1-6
L#2 SinglesEvelyn Carroll vs Caitlin Morris5-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesAmy Czaplewski / Jean Herda vs Marina Walther-Antonio / Alice Lembach6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-06-03vs Chalmers/Wildfeuer RACLost 14
L#1 DoublesJulie Freidhoff / Melanie Lyden vs Lisa Teske / Elizabeth Obert2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMadison Couser vs Diana Kelm6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAmy Czaplewski / Gabriella Bedekovicsne-Gajdos vs Sarah Chalmers / Amy Crockett3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesEvelyn Carroll vs Marina Walther-Antonio1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTheresa Sampson Brown / Lori Julian vs Jessica Wang / Heshan Liu1-6, 0-6
2026-05-27vs Chalmers/Wildfeuer RACLost 14
L#1 DoublesMadison Couser / Torrey Bakke vs Heshan Liu / Jessica Wang3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesSarah Bauer vs Marina Walther-Antonio6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAmy Czaplewski / Gabriella Bedekovicsne-Gajdos vs Anne Colby / Jodi Kruse4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesJessica Balcom vs Caitlin Roth1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesTheresa Sampson Brown / Raelene Shufelt vs Elizabeth Obert / Dawn Wildfeuer3-6, 1-6
2026-05-20vs Chalmers/Wildfeuer RACLost 14
L#1 DoublesTorrey Bakke / Theresa Sampson Brown vs Caitlin Roth / Jodi Kruse0-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMadison Couser vs Brittany Luther1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesGabriella Bedekovicsne-Gajdos / Raelene Shufelt vs Sarah Chalmers / Dawn Wildfeuer0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesJessica Balcom vs Mabel Ryder3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAmy Czaplewski / Jean Herda vs Diana Kelm / Kathryn Palen7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Chalmers/Wildfeuer RAC81331228294
2Net Smashers Couser RTC18123371487

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Sarah Bauer
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.22
Lori Julian
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.19
Yuki Munden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Torrey Bakke
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
3.14
Madison Couser
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.13
Jean Herda
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.06
Julie Freidhoff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Amy Czaplewski
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.01
Gabriella Bedekovicsne-Gajdos
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
2.96
Evelyn Carroll
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 38% · published
2.96
Theresa Sampson Brown
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
2.92
Melanie Lyden
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
2.92
Jessica Balcom
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Singles 27% · published
2.80
Raelene Shufelt
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.71
Magdalena Geske
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Magdalena Geske + Melanie Lyden3447% games+2.8% vs expected
Amy Czaplewski + Jean Herda2545% games−4.2% vs expected
Raelene Shufelt + Gabriella Bedekovicsne-Gajdos0623% games−20.5% vs expected
Julie Freidhoff + Yuki Munden134 matchesnot enough data
Raelene Shufelt + Melanie Lyden134 matchesnot enough data
Melanie Lyden + Jessica Balcom224 matchesnot enough data
Theresa Sampson Brown + Melanie Lyden123 matchesnot enough data
Gabriella Bedekovicsne-Gajdos + Amy Czaplewski033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Bauer
22W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.51
Lori Julian
16W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Yuki Munden
24W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19
Torrey Bakke
11W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
Madison Couser
25W–17L career · 12 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
Jean Herda
4W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.13
Julie Freidhoff
3W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.06
3.5
Amy Czaplewski
7W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
34%65%<1%
3.06
Gabriella Bedekovicsne-Gajdos
5W–21L career · 6 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.01
Evelyn Carroll
7W–10L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
2.96
Theresa Sampson Brown
3W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
2.96
Melanie Lyden
30W–23L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.92
Jessica Balcom
29W–26L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.92
Raelene Shufelt
2W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
93%7%<1%
2.80
Magdalena Geske
9W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.