Teams

MARIN TC CM8.5A

2021 COMBO · Men 8.5

18 players · average NTRP 4.08 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-11-27vs ROLLING HILLS CM8.5ALost 01
L#2 DoublesJonathan Parker / Robert Lang vs Joel Parrish / Eric Zahra0-6, 2-6
2021-10-16vs LA CANTERA RC CM8.5ALost 01
L#3 DoublesRobert Lang / Jody Osterweil vs Steve Carter / Jamin Ruark1-6, 2-6
2021-10-02vs MILL VALLEY CM8.5ALost 01
L#1 DoublesFavio de Marco / Robert Lang vs Paul Stiff / Lane Shackleton3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Favio de Marco
published 4.5
Chris Trepte
published 4.5
3.84
Kevin Dufficy
published
3.81
Carnet Williams
published 4
3.78
Robert Ahearn
published
3.77
Jeffery Birkenseer
published
3.75
Jason Tuttle
published
Doug van Gessel
published 4
Gary Russillo
published 4
3.72
John Honey
published
3.67
Jason Holmes
published
3.65
Samuel Pleasure
published
3.55
William Chamberlin
published
3.44
Steve Juliani
published
3.40
Robert Lang
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.34
Jody Osterweil
published
3.32
David Hirschkop
published 3.5
3.23
Jeffrey Kent
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Favio de Marco
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
4.26
4.5
Chris Trepte
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kevin Dufficy
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Carnet Williams
8W–6L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.81
Robert Ahearn
4W–6L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.78
Jeffery Birkenseer
7W–2L career · no lines in 2021
<1%2%98%
3.77
Jason Tuttle
3W–6L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Doug van Gessel
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Gary Russillo
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
John Honey
17W–7L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%2%
3.72
Jason Holmes
17W–9L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.67
Samuel Pleasure
13W–9L career · no lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.65
William Chamberlin
11W–9L career · no lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
3.55
Steve Juliani
15W–11L career · no lines in 2021
<1%67%33%
3.44
Robert Lang
11W–28L career · 3 lines in 2021
77%23%<1%
3.40
Jody Osterweil
5W–12L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
David Hirschkop
4W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.32
Jeffrey Kent
14W–13L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.