Teams

OLYMPIC 18AW4.0A

2022 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.79 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.18
Caitlin Beatty
published 4.5
4.04
Lisa Lohre
published
4.00
Karla Lovett
published
3.99
Rebecca Belding
published
3.82
3.56
Rita Williams
published
3.55
Marie Allman
published
3.55
Catherine Kelley
published 4
3.53
Carla Hultman
published 4
3.31
Elizabeth Griffiths
published 3.5
3.29
Lisa Carlin
published
3.26
Blair Evans
published 3.5
2.60
Elizabeth Cooper
published 3
Julie Christy
published
Kayla Emmerson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Kelley + Catherine Fogelman4254% games+3.1% vs expected
Lisa Lohre + Caitlin Beatty9553% games+2.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Caitlin Beatty
13W–6L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
4.18
Lisa Lohre
9W–9L career · no lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
4.04
Karla Lovett
0W–9L career · no lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
4.00
Rebecca Belding
6W–0L career · no lines in 2022
<1%54%46%
3.99
4
Catherine Fogelman
20W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
Rita Williams
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.56
Marie Allman
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.55
4
Catherine Kelley
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Carla Hultman
1W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.53
3.5
Elizabeth Griffiths
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Lisa Carlin
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
95%5%<1%
3.29
3.5
Blair Evans
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
3
Elizabeth Cooper
5W–12L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
2.60
Julie Christy
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kayla Emmerson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.