Teams

GreyHawk / Orlich

2026 Collier Adult 55 & Over ESL Fall · Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-12-04vs Players Club / B.KropkoLost 12
L#1 DoublesPatty McManus / Jodi Saxman vs Heather Claes / Barbara Kvitle3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLinda Orlich / Ulla Wolff vs Marcia Leonard / Ann McDonald6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesFrancine Pfohl / Louise Gallagher vs Beth Kropko / Kathleen Greenawalt5-7, 0-6
2025-11-20vs Worthington / E. HerseyLost 03
L#1 DoublesPatty McManus / Linda Orlich vs Suzie Crews / Marie Zinno2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCory Witters / Ulla Wolff vs Erika Ross / Maria Hush4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJodi Saxman / Sue Schmidt vs Cappy Johnson / Ali Riccio4-6, 4-6
2025-11-16vs Village Walk Bonita / LaggisLost 12
L#1 DoublesLaura Haney / Sara Martineson vs Margaret Laggis / Marcia Kenyon1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCory Witters / Ulla Wolff vs Ann Kremer / Joan Dilkey5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesFrancine Pfohl / Louise Gallagher vs Joan Ravens / Ellen Iverson1-6, 2-6
2025-11-13vs Bonita Bay / WongLost 12
W#1 DoublesSara Martineson / Patty McManus vs Susan Flagg / Linda Larsen6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMaureen Ahern / Nancy Rubino vs Teresa Regelmann / Angela Clark2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLinda Orlich / Sue Schmidt vs Terri Higgins / Vivian Wong4-6, 2-6
2025-11-06vs Hammock Bay / CraneWon 21
L#1 DoublesMaureen Ahern / Patty McManus vs Jane Hadley / Jacquie Currie0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLinda Orlich / Sara Martineson vs Gloria Anderson / Paula Crane6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLouise Gallagher / Jodi Saxman vs Brita Swanson / Cheryl Trzcinski7-6, 6-1
L#1 DoublesLinda Orlich / Patty McManus vs Lorraine Steuerer / Glenda Stein4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Haney / Jodi Saxman vs Patricia Arthur / Maria Prochilo4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCory Witters / Ulla Wolff vs Barbara Laustsen / Bobbi Burnett4-6, 3-6
2025-10-30vs Cambier / TrombleyLost 12
L#1 DoublesLinda Orlich / Sara Martineson vs Bonnie Dunayer / Lorraine Kaplan3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMaureen Ahern / Laura Haney vs Caroline Rogers / Brenda Smith2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCory Witters / Ulla Wolff vs Elise McHugh-Joyce / Monica Vorisek3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-10-16vs Marco YMCA / ConteWon 21
W#1 DoublesSara Martineson / Linda Orlich vs Jan Jackman / Cecilia Murphy6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMaureen Ahern / Ulla Wolff vs Sally Mattke / Georgia Ehrlund2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJudith Davis / Sue Schmidt vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Sara Martineson
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.29
Laura Haney
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
3.16
Cory Witters
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.93
Ulla Wolff
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.90
Jodi Saxman
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Francine Pfohl
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Judith Davis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Linda Orlich
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Louise Gallagher
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
Maureen Ahern
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Nancy Rubino
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Patty McManus
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sue Schmidt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jodi Saxman + Laura Haney5643% gamesnot enough data
Cory Witters + Ulla Wolff3445% gamesnot enough data
Ulla Wolff + Linda Orlich3349% gamesnot enough data
Sara Martineson + Linda Orlich4258% gamesnot enough data
Patty McManus + Sara Martineson224 matchesnot enough data
Jodi Saxman + Louise Gallagher404 matchesnot enough data
Patty McManus + Linda Orlich033 matchesnot enough data
Laura Haney + Sara Martineson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sara Martineson
11W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.35
Laura Haney
374W–273L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Cory Witters
112W–125L career · 4 lines in 2026
13%87%1%
3.16
Ulla Wolff
16W–31L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
Jodi Saxman
28W–65L career · 7 lines in 2026
76%24%<1%
2.90
Francine Pfohl
1W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Judith Davis
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Linda Orlich
10W–14L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Louise Gallagher
7W–6L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Maureen Ahern
6W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nancy Rubino
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Patty McManus
38W–38L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sue Schmidt
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.