Teams

Hammock Bay / Crane

2026 Collier Adult 55 & Over ESL Fall · Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-12-04vs Village Walk Bonita / LaggisLost 12
W#1 DoublesKelly Lord / Paula Crane vs Marcia Kenyon / Ellen Iverson0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJacquie Currie / Gloria Anderson vs Margaret Laggis / Hope Malin4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Miller / Brita Swanson vs Joan Ravens / Ann Kremer0-6, 2-6
2025-11-20vs Bonita Bay / WongLost 02
L#1 DoublesJane Hadley / Jacquie Currie vs Terri Higgins / Laura Cirillo3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLaraine Segar / Maureen Huscroft vs Teresa Regelmann / Susan Flagg5-7, 2-6
2025-11-18vs Cambier / TrombleyLost 01
L#1 DoublesGloria Anderson / Maureen Huscroft vs Carol Cohen / Caroline Rogers1-6, 0-6
2025-11-13vs Players Club / B.KropkoLost 02
L#1 DoublesJane Hadley / Jacquie Currie vs Lisa McNichol / Mary Gorte6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGloria Anderson / Maureen Huscroft vs Meghan Clemente / Beth Kropko1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-11-06vs GreyHawk / OrlichLost 12
W#1 DoublesJane Hadley / Jacquie Currie vs Maureen Ahern / Patty McManus6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesGloria Anderson / Paula Crane vs Linda Orlich / Sara Martineson1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBrita Swanson / Cheryl Trzcinski vs Louise Gallagher / Jodi Saxman6-7, 1-6
2025-11-04vs Worthington / E. HerseyLost 02
L#1 DoublesJane Hadley / Maureen Huscroft vs Suzie Crews / Marie Zinno1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesPaula Crane / Gloria Anderson vs Veronica Frusteri / Cappy Johnson4-6, 6-7
2025-10-30vs Marco YMCA / ConteLost 12
L#1 DoublesLaraine Segar / Jane Hadley vs Ramsay Erickson / Jane Sarver3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGloria Anderson / Maureen Huscroft vs Kristine Bergenheim / Georgia Ehrlund3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBrita Swanson / Jacquie Currie vs Joyce Hail / Suzanne Messere1-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesLaraine Segar / Susan Miller vs Lorraine Steuerer / Valerie Barrett4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKelly Lord / Paula Crane vs Glenda Stein / Maria Prochilo6-7, 6-0, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1COLLIER/Marco YMCA /Schaufus701838128
2Flight x Winners/Marco YMCA / Washak6117413146
3Pelican Bay North / J.Howard6117413165
4Flight Z Winners/Valencia Bonita / Steuerer6116513153
5Pelican Bay South / S.Abrams5214716164
6Bonita Bay / Wong5213817161
7Fiddlers Creek / LadiesAces/ L.Keely2571432225
8Fiddlers Creek / Gabriel2561533235
9Sterling Oaks / Schroer2561533228
10Treviso Bay / Milos1661532232
11Hammock Bay / Crane0731838229

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Kelly Lord
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.20
Laraine Segar
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
Brita Swanson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Jane Hadley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Maureen Huscroft
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.53
Cheryl Trzcinski
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Gloria Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Jacquie Currie
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Paula Crane
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cheryl Trzcinski + Paula Crane2642% gamesnot enough data
Jane Hadley + Jacquie Currie2352% gamesnot enough data
Gloria Anderson + Maureen Huscroft123 matchesnot enough data
Gloria Anderson + Laraine Segar033 matchesnot enough data
Jane Hadley + Maureen Huscroft033 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Lord + Paula Crane213 matchesnot enough data
Maureen Huscroft + Paula Crane123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Lord
23W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Laraine Segar
22W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.20
3.5
Brita Swanson
19W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
Jane Hadley
76W–78L career · 5 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
3.12
Maureen Huscroft
54W–43L career · 5 lines in 2026
80%20%<1%
2.88
3
Cheryl Trzcinski
30W–70L career · 8 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
2.53
Gloria Anderson
57W–73L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jacquie Currie
10W–14L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Paula Crane
6W–15L career · 10 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.