Teams

Treviso Bay / Milos

2026 Collier Adult 55 & Over ESL Fall · Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-12-04vs Audubon / P. DavisLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathy Hamilton / Cathy Miles vs Alexandra Thorne / Terry Hammer6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDenise Reilly / Katie Boyer vs Michele Stahl / Lynne Gorski1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMary Ferrell / Lauri Garvey vs Jennifer Lakefield / Linda Moore1-6, 5-7
2025-11-20vs Grey Oaks / N.BrownLost 12
W#1 DoublesCheryl Rauch / Denise Reilly vs Nancy Brown / Frances Fitzgerald7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMarybeth Broderick / Cathy Miles vs Lori Bell / Maureen Dougherty7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJennifer Allen / Mary Ferrell vs Lisa Spartin / Kathleen Sylvester0-6, 0-6
2025-11-18vs Hammock Bay / CraneWon 10
W#3 DoublesLillian Burke / Monique Berlinger vs Paula Crane / Cheryl Trzcinski3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-11-13vs Sterling Oaks / SchroerLost 12
W#1 DoublesDenise Reilly / Cathy Miles vs Laura Goetz / Cheryl Cacciotti6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCheryl Rauch / Marybeth Broderick vs Tobi Weinstein / Terese Surges6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKatie Boyer / Mary Ferrell vs Mary Feldman / DEBORAH Eck1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-11-06vs Pelican Bay North / J.HowardLost 03
L#1 DoublesDenise Reilly / Cathy Miles vs Denna Saidnawey / Amy Enxing3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesKathy Hamilton / Kathleen Barger vs Sue Malek / Judi Howard2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Allen / Marybeth Broderick vs Jincie Duane / Patricia Clayman0-6, 0-6
2025-11-04vs Players Club / B.KropkoWon 10
W#3 DoublesKaren Sieffert / Monique Berlinger vs Ann McDonald / Mary Gorte6-1, 6-4
W#1 DoublesCheryl Rauch / Kathy Hamilton vs Linda Keely / Barbara Slifkin6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDenise Reilly / Katie Boyer vs Dawn Cooper / Victoria Pollock7-6, 7-6
L#3 DoublesKathleen Barger / Marybeth Broderick vs Laura Murphy / Linda Streett3-6, 2-6
2025-10-23vs Olde Cypress / NavarroLost 12
W#1 DoublesDenise Reilly / Cheryl Rauch vs Michelle Maggal / Brenda Bensmiller6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesKathleen Barger / Katie Boyer vs Cheryl Toth / Marketa Dieckmann6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJennifer Allen / Monique Berlinger vs Libby Eckert / Linda Boyd5-7, 2-6
2025-10-16vs COLLIER/Marco YMCA /SchaufusLost 02
L#1 DoublesCheryl Rauch / Kathleen Barger vs Susan Julich / Ana Cecilia Isaza4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDenise Reilly / Jennifer Allen vs Susan Juels / Jodi Schaufus1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1COLLIER/Marco YMCA /Schaufus701838128
2Flight x Winners/Marco YMCA / Washak6117413146
3Pelican Bay North / J.Howard6117413165
4Flight Z Winners/Valencia Bonita / Steuerer6116513153
5Pelican Bay South / S.Abrams5214716164
6Bonita Bay / Wong5213817161
7Fiddlers Creek / LadiesAces/ L.Keely2571432225
8Fiddlers Creek / Gabriel2561533235
9Sterling Oaks / Schroer2561533228
10Treviso Bay / Milos1661532232
11Hammock Bay / Crane0731838229

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Cathy Miles
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.26
Denise Reilly
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.25
Cheryl Rauch
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.93
Monique Berlinger
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.83
Marybeth Broderick
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Jennifer Allen
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Kathleen Barger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Kathy Hamilton
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Katie Boyer
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Lauri Garvey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Ferrell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cathy Miles
9W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.36
3.5
Denise Reilly
54W–37L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Cheryl Rauch
106W–90L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Monique Berlinger
14W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.93
3.5
Marybeth Broderick
18W–68L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
89%11%<1%
2.83
Jennifer Allen
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kathleen Barger
2W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kathy Hamilton
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Katie Boyer
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lauri Garvey
0W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Mary Ferrell
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.