Teams

Grey Oaks / N.Brown

2026 Collier Adult 55 & Over ESL Fall · Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-12-04vs Pelican Bay North / J.HowardLost 03
L#1 DoublesMonica Callaghan / Robin Engelson vs Denna Saidnawey / Amy Enxing3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Brown / Rosemary Cronin vs Sue Malek / Behnoosh Behmaram3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMaureen Dougherty / Kathleen Sylvester vs Rita Chimel / Jincie Duane6-7, 3-6
2025-11-20vs Treviso Bay / MilosWon 21
L#1 DoublesNancy Brown / Frances Fitzgerald vs Cheryl Rauch / Denise Reilly6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLori Bell / Maureen Dougherty vs Marybeth Broderick / Cathy Miles5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Spartin / Kathleen Sylvester vs Jennifer Allen / Mary Ferrell6-0, 6-0
2025-11-13vs Olde Cypress / NavarroWon 21
W#1 DoublesMonica Callaghan / Janet Seidl vs Michelle Maggal / Brenda Bensmiller7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLindsey Burke / Frances Fitzgerald vs Cheryl Comes / Barbara Hurt-Simmons4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMaureen Dougherty / Lori Bell vs Marketa Dieckmann / Libby Eckert6-2, 6-3
W#1 DoublesMonica Callaghan / Lorrie Lavery vs Barbara Slifkin / Laura Murphy6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLindsey Burke / Rosemary Cronin vs Linda Keely / Jennifer Bauer4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLisa Spartin / Maria Lafontaine vs Marianne Gaffney / Dorothea Farmer6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2025-10-30vs COLLIER/Marco YMCA /SchaufusLost 12
W#1 DoublesMonica Callaghan / Janet Seidl vs Susan Julich / Shirley Steffen4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLorrie Lavery / Frances Fitzgerald vs Lisa Campbell / Inge Lund6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Brown / Robin Engelson vs Ana Cecilia Isaza / Ricki Giersch4-6, 4-6
2025-10-23vs Audubon / P. DavisWon 30
W#1 DoublesMonica Callaghan / Janet Seidl vs Jane Mills / Haewon Feltsman6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesNancy Brown / Robin Engelson vs Terry Hammer / Pam Davis6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMaureen Dougherty / Sharon Herbst vs Jill Teberg / Lynne Gorski6-4, 6-4
2025-10-16vs Sterling Oaks / SchroerWon 30
W#1 DoublesMonica Callaghan / Lorrie Lavery vs DEBORAH Eck / Cheryl Schroer7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNancy Brown / Robin Engelson vs Anne Pauls / Mary Feldman6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMaureen Dougherty / Maria Lafontaine vs Lynn Cifonelli / Chris Squires6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Lorrie Lavery
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.27
Lori Bell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.21
Maureen Dougherty
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.17
Maria Lafontaine
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Sharon Herbst
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Kathleen Sylvester
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Frances Fitzgerald
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Janet Seidl
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Lindsey Burke
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Spartin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Monica Callaghan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Robin Engelson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Rosemary Cronin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Aldrich
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria Lafontaine + Sharon Herbst3251% games+8.0% vs expected
Kathleen Sylvester + Maria Lafontaine0536% games−7.5% vs expected
Kathleen Sylvester + Sharon Herbst1437% gamesnot enough data
Monica Callaghan + Janet Seidl303 matchesnot enough data
Lori Bell + Maria Lafontaine033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lorrie Lavery
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.35
Lori Bell
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Maureen Dougherty
30W–48L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
Maria Lafontaine
5W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Sharon Herbst
9W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
14%86%1%
3.15
Kathleen Sylvester
32W–38L career · 2 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.03
Frances Fitzgerald
1W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Janet Seidl
11W–4L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lindsey Burke
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lisa Spartin
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Monica Callaghan
8W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Robin Engelson
5W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rosemary Cronin
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Aldrich
0W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.