Teams

Lonely Artists Guild 4.0W Singles

2023 Howard Columbia Singles · Howard Columbia Singles 4.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-10-23Lost 01
L#2 SinglesKelsey Forbes vs Jennifer Lee3-6, 1-6
2023-10-08Split 11
L#2 SinglesTina Halley vs Vicki Williamson0-6, 6-7
W#3 SinglesKelsey Forbes vs Stephanie Richards3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-09-30Won 10
W#2 SinglesTina Halley vs Stephanie Richards6-1, 6-3
2023-09-16vs Singles Social Club 4.0W SinglesLost 01
L#3 SinglesTina Halley vs Brooke Schetgen2-6, 0-6
2023-09-10vs Singles Social Club 4.0W SinglesLost 01
L#2 SinglesKelsey Forbes vs Sandra Kick1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Columbia Singles 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Kim Dowd
published
4.00
Madison Simmons
published
3.96
Jill Rose
published
3.89
Sara Orthwein
published
3.88
Tina Halley
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.69
Kelsey Forbes
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 38% · published 4
3.68
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Dowd
22W–44L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
4.03
Madison Simmons
13W–17L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
4.00
Jill Rose
49W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.96
Sara Orthwein
20W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Tina Halley
128W–66L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Kelsey Forbes
141W–114L career · 8 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Christine Alewine
4W–11L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.