Teams

Floyd-Anderson/18/8.5/CM/BTC

2026 Shrev-Boss Southern Combo 18 & Over - Men · 8.5 Shrev

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 8 7:30 PM
North Bossier Tennis Center
Sep 15 7:30 PM
Pierremont Oaks Tennis Club
Sep 22 6:30 PM
North Bossier Tennis Center
Sep 29 7:30 PM
Pierremont Oaks Tennis Club
2026-09-01vs Stanton/18/8.5/CM/POTCLost 02
L#2 DoublesRidge Creech / Jonah Jones vs Slattery Johnson / James McMaster5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesEric MacLin / Andrew Inabnet vs Jonathon Clark / Robert Jeter6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2026-08-25vs Stanton/18/8.5/CM/POTCSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMarc Paz / Andrew Inabnet vs James Wilson / Harry Johnson7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesEric MacLin / Jared Roge vs Will Street / Thomas Rodsuwan4-6, 4-6
2026-08-18vs Stanton/18/8.5/CM/POTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesKody Anderson / Levi Holley vs James Wilson / Frank Leonard4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSteven Floyd / Michael Lauseng vs Jonathon Clark / Thomas Rodsuwan1-6, 1-4
W#3 DoublesMarc Paz / Andrew Inabnet vs Will Street / Slattery Johnson6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.5 Shrev
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Stanton/18/8.5/CM/POTC000000
2Floyd-Anderson/18/8.5/CM/BTC000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.03 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.53
Marc Paz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.22
Kody Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.17
Ridge Creech
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.02
Jared Fry
published
3.90
Jared Roge
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.87
Andrew Inabnet
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.87
Levi Holley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
Michael Lauseng
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Inabnet + Levi Holley213 matchesnot enough data
Andrew Inabnet + Marc Paz303 matchesnot enough data
Michael Lauseng + Jared Fry213 matchesnot enough data
Levi Holley + Jared Fry303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marc Paz
12W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
4.53
Kody Anderson
8W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
4.22
Ridge Creech
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%1%
4.17
Jared Fry
34W–16L career · no lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
4.02
Jared Roge
11W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.90
4
Andrew Inabnet
20W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.87
Levi Holley
22W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.87
Michael Lauseng
22W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.