Teams

SRTC-Measley

2023 OH OV SUMMER A55&O Dayton · 2023 SUMMER A 55&O 8.0M Dayton

10 players · average NTRP 3.80 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-08-07vs KTC-TomanLost 01
L#2 DoublesJeff Fortner / Dean Williams vs Jim Minard / Rick Hammerly5-7, 4-6
2023-07-20vs KTC-TomanLost 02
L#2 DoublesJeff Fortner / Dean Williams vs Jim Minard / Rick Hammerly6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAlain Terzakis / Rick Quigley vs Vidyashankar Revan / Greg Haack1-6, 1-6
2023-06-29vs KTC-TomanLost 01
L#3 DoublesJeff Fortner / Steve Johannes vs James Bosse / Greg Haack6-1, 0-6, 1-0
2023-06-15vs KTC-TomanLost 01
L#3 DoublesJeff Fortner / David Allen vs Jim Minard / Vidyashankar Revan5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2023 SUMMER A 55&O 8.0M Dayton
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KTC-Toman5113513139
2SRTC-Measley1551330201

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alain Terzakis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Bob Lyons
published 4
David Ehlers
published 4
3.46
Kyle Webb
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.31
Dave Measley
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
James Oakes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.98
Steve Johannes
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Andrew Trapp
published
Jeff Fortner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Rick Quigley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Oakes + Rick Quigley5152% games+8.5% vs expected
Rick Quigley + Dave Measley231353% games+1.2% vs expected
James Oakes + Dave Measley2543% games−3.6% vs expected
Bob Lyons + Dave Measley1534% games−3.8% vs expected
Steve Johannes + Dave Measley6072% gamesnot enough data
Kyle Webb + Dave Measley224 matchesnot enough data
Dave Measley + Andrew Trapp224 matchesnot enough data
Steve Johannes + Kyle Webb213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alain Terzakis
1W–9L career · type S · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
4
Bob Lyons
15W–20L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
David Ehlers
22W–31L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kyle Webb
186W–114L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Dave Measley
137W–129L career · 8 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
James Oakes
54W–57L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Steve Johannes
141W–75L career · 3 lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
2.98
Andrew Trapp
4W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jeff Fortner
8W–23L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Rick Quigley
67W–69L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.