Teams

TCT: Love 2 Play: Eustace/Adams

2025 SCT Adult 40 & Over Women · 3.0 W - 3

18 players · average NTRP 2.86 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
W#1 DoublesEllen Lewis / Christine Kay vs Annmarie Maguire / Laura Hotchkiss6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesYumiko Hawke vs Sarah Richardson6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesHeather Nelson / Maura O'Halloran vs Kimberly Grosso / Deborah Nicolson7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCheryl Dowd / Joan Hawley vs Loralie Held / Judy Dalaker6-3, 7-5
W#1 DoublesCheryl Eustace / Jennifer Richard vs Ellen McCabe / Deirdre Chrostowski6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJennifer Luongo vs Jill Grego6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCarol Levarek / Heather Nelson vs Karina Frey / Dika Nussberg0-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJanet Debenedetto / Carol Sherwin vs Radka Lorenzetti / Ewelina Sikora3-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesLisa VanZyl / Janet Debenedetto vs Laura Hotchkiss / Christina Spizzirri6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJennifer Luongo vs Astrid Alvarez Clavijo6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesYumiko Hawke / Lori Zanchetti vs Judy Dalaker / Kimberly Grosso6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJen Hinkle / Suzanne Adams vs Loralie Held / Deborah Nicolson6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 W - 3 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Heather Nelson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Ellen Lewis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.74
Cheryl Eustace
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Yumiko Hawke
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.71
Lisa VanZyl
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Carol Mairano
published 3
2.62
Jennifer Luongo
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.61
Janet Debenedetto
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.58
Cheryl Dowd
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.57
Carol Levarek
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.54
Suzanne Adams
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.54
Maura O'Halloran
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Jen Hinkle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.44
Christine Kay
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.44
Joan Hawley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.44
Lori Zanchetti
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.29
Ann Weiss
published 2.5
Carol Sherwin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Yumiko Hawke + Ellen Lewis6360% games+10.5% vs expected
Lisa VanZyl + Ellen Lewis4350% games+9.0% vs expected
Janet Debenedetto + Lisa VanZyl5164% games+8.5% vs expected
Janet Debenedetto + Cheryl Eustace7159% games+6.5% vs expected
Yumiko Hawke + Heather Nelson3255% games+5.9% vs expected
Ann Weiss + Cheryl Dowd7554% games+3.4% vs expected
Yumiko Hawke + Cheryl Eustace3355% games+1.5% vs expected
Cheryl Eustace + Carol Mairano71249% games+0.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Heather Nelson
69W–67L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
Ellen Lewis
62W–48L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Cheryl Eustace
44W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
Yumiko Hawke
42W–53L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Lisa VanZyl
46W–39L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Carol Mairano
21W–22L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Jennifer Luongo
29W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.62
Janet Debenedetto
30W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
3
Cheryl Dowd
26W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
27%72%<1%
2.58
3
Carol Levarek
38W–46L career · 1 line in 2025
32%68%<1%
2.57
Suzanne Adams
31W–35L career · 1 line in 2025
38%61%<1%
2.54
Maura O'Halloran
27W–47L career · 1 line in 2025
39%61%<1%
2.54
Jen Hinkle
22W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
49%51%<1%
2.50
3
Christine Kay
38W–49L career · 1 line in 2025
67%33%<1%
2.44
Joan Hawley
13W–31L career · 1 line in 2025
67%33%<1%
2.44
Lori Zanchetti
17W–42L career · 1 line in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.44
2.5
Ann Weiss
48W–47L career · no lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.29
2.5
Carol Sherwin
6W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.