Teams

COLE 6.5 Combo 55s Tues

2023 Piedmont Combo 55 & Over · Women 6.5 55 & Over

11 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-09-25vs Shivaji/Selley 6.5 Combo 55s TuesWon 10
W#1 DoublesEmily Wilson / Michelle Shoemaker vs Kelly Smith / Tiffany Weeks6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesEmily Wilson / Michelle Shoemaker vs Susan Shughart / Susan Rabold3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-08-22vs Kirby 6.5 Combo 55s TuesWon 10
W#1 DoublesEmily Wilson / Michelle Shoemaker vs Vania Robinson / Margaret Joseph6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-08-15vs Gorham 6.5 Combo 65s TuesWon 10
W#2 DoublesEmily Wilson / Michelle Shoemaker vs Jean Pudlo / Monica Medina-Murphy2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-08-08vs Michaels 6.5 Combo 55s TuesWon 10
W#3 DoublesMichelle Shoemaker / Emily Wilson vs Wanda Davis / Terrie Brown6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Julia Barnes
published
3.10
Emily Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.08
Elia Mavronikolas
published 3.5
3.00
Medy Wurth
published
2.97
Michelle Shoemaker
published
2.94
2.85
Ila Rosenthal
published 3
2.77
Meghan Flynn
published
Debra Elium
published 3
2.47
Rose Chrismon
published
Karen D Smith
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julia Barnes
22W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Emily Wilson
179W–124L career · 5 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Elia Mavronikolas
27W–42L career · type A · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.08
Medy Wurth
14W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%50%50%
3.00
Michelle Shoemaker
13W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Elizabeth Deterding
14W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%32%
2.94
3
Ila Rosenthal
11W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
2.85
Meghan Flynn
18W–37L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Debra Elium
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rose Chrismon
3W–26L career · no lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
2.47
Karen D Smith
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.